Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Vagus Nerve Stimulation As an Adjunctive Neurostimulation Tool in Treatment-resistant Depression
Published on: January 7, 2019
Vagus nerve stimulation as an adjunctive therapy for super-refractory status epilepticus including NORSE: a
Ji Yeoun Yoo1, Jessica Bloomfield2, Onome Eka1
1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States.
Rationale:
Resistance to anti-seizure medications (ASMs) remains a major challenge in managing super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), including new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE). Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) has emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy, but clinical evidence in SRSE is limited.
Methods:
We retrospectively identified patients who underwent VNS implantation for SRSE during hospitalization within a large tertiary hospital system in New York City (July 2018 - June 2024). Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographic, clinical features, neuroimaging, EEG findings, medications, VNS parameters, and short- and long-term functional outcomes.
Results:
Fifteen patients (14 female; age 16-77 years) underwent VNS implantation for SRSE, including 8 with NORSE (6 cryptogenic; 2 with a later-identified etiology) and 7 non-NORSE patients. Compared to non-NORSE patients, NORSE patients received more ASMs (median 5 vs. 4) and anesthetic infusions (3 vs 2) for longer duration (14.5 vs. 11 days) before implantation. All but one patient was successfully weaned off anesthetics without SE recurrence; VNS output at weaning was higher in NORSE patients (0.88 vs. 0.50 mA). No complications were observed related to VNS implantation or titration. Despite longer hospitalization (86.5 vs 47 days) and similar ASM burden (4) and functional status at discharge (GOS-E 3), NORSE patients showed a trend toward better long-term functional outcomes (GOS-E 7 vs 1, p = 0.31), despite developing post-NORSE epilepsy. In exploratory analyses, earlier implantation showed non-significant trends toward shorter hospitalization (47 vs. 116 days, p = 0.09) and higher discharge GOS-E (4 vs. 2.5, p = 0.06).
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that VNS is likely a safe addition to the established treatment for SRSE. However, given the retrospective and uncontrolled design, efficacy of VNS cannot be determined. Prospective controlled studies are needed to assess clinical benefit and to define optimal implantation timing, titration strategies, and short-and long-term outcomes, including post-NORSE epilepsy.
Related Concept Videos
Epilepsy and Seizures: Overview
Various factors can trigger epilepsy, including genetic factors, brain damage, metabolic causes, and unknown etiology. Diagnosis of epilepsy involves electroencephalography (EEG), which...
Antiepileptic Drugs: Modulators of Neurotransmitter Release Mediated by SV2A Protein
SV2A is a transmembrane glycoprotein located predominantly in the brain, modulating the release of neurotransmitters for neuronal communication. Both levetiracetam and brivaracetam exhibit a high affinity for...
Antiepileptic Drugs: GABAergic Pathway Potentiators
The key GABA pathway potentiators used in epilepsy management are as follows.
Benzodiazepines are a well-known class of drugs used for...
Electroconvulsive Therapy
Seizures: Classification
Seizures are typically classified into two main categories: focal and generalized seizures.
Focal Seizures
Focal seizures originate from specific regions of the brain. These seizures are further sub-classified into two types:
Antiepileptic Drugs: Glutamate Antagonists

