Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Assessment of Pulmonary Capillary Blood Volume, Membrane Diffusing Capacity, and Intrapulmonary Arteriovenous Anastomoses During Exercise
Published on: February 20, 2017
A comparison of pulmonary capillary blood volume and membrane diffusing capacity assessed via two pulmonary diffusing
Andrew W D'Souza1, Andrew R Brotto2, Chuanyi Foo2
1Divison of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Background:
The combined measurement of pulmonary diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (D LCO) and nitric oxide (D LNO) permits the interrogation of pulmonary capillary blood volume (V c) and membrane diffusing capacity (D m) from a single-breath hold, providing a less onerous means of evaluating pulmonary microvascular function than the classic Roughton-Forster multiple fractions of inspired oxygen approach (mF iO2 -D LCO). Despite its growing utility, the concordance between D LCO, V c and D m derived from the D LCO/D LNO and mF iO2 -D LCO approaches remains unclear. Thus, we sought to evaluate the agreement between D LCO, V c and D m measured via the single-breath D LCO/D LNO and the mF iO2 -D LCO approaches at baseline as well as during exercise and postural stress. We hypothesised that there would be strong agreement between the two approaches for D LCO and V c.
Methods:
16 healthy young adults (5 female; age: 24±4 years) completed two experimental visits: 1) cycling at 30% and 60% of peak oxygen consumption (V'O2peak), and 2) postural stress (supine-to-60°head-up tilt (HUT)). D LCO, V c and D m were measured via the combined D LCO/D LNO (Hypair) and mF IO2 -D LCO approaches (randomised) at each stage.
Results:
During baseline and exercise, D LCO demonstrated excellent agreement between measurement approaches (baseline intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.92 (95% CI 0.79-0.97); 30% V'O2peak ICC 0.89 (95% CI 0.71-0.96); 60% V'O2peak ICC 0.94 (95% CI 0.93-0.98), all p<0.001). V c exhibited moderate-to-very good agreement (baseline ICC 0.61 (95% CI 0.17-0.85); 30% V'O2peak ICC 0.77 (95% CI 0.46-0.91); 60% V'O2peak ICC 0.51 (95% CI 0.01-0.81), all p≤0.022), while D m had poor-to-moderate agreement (baseline ICC 0.19 (95% CI -0.32-0.62), p=0.228; 30% V'O2peak ICC 0.43 (95% CI -0.08-0.77), p=0.046; 60% V'O2peak ICC 0.51 (95% CI -0.01-0.82), p=0.026). Similar results were observed during postural stress.
Conclusion:
These data indicate that D LCO and V c, but not D m, derived from the D LCO/D LNO and mF IO2 -D LCO approach are comparable.
More Related Videos
08:44Author Spotlight: Integrating Alveolar-Capillary Reserve Measurements in Exercise Adaptation and Therapeutic Strategies
Published on: February 2, 2024
08:25Combining Volumetric Capnography And Barometric Plethysmography To Measure The Lung Structure-function Relationship
Published on: January 8, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this...
External and Internal Respiration
Respiratory Capacities
One key metric is the Inspiratory Capacity (IC), which represents the maximum amount of air that can be inhaled with full effort. IC is calculated by summing the tidal volume and inspiratory reserve volume, typically ranging from 2.4 to 3.6 liters.
The Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) represents the air in the...
Lung Capacity
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities