Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spherical adsorptive carbon use and risks of dialysis initiation and mortality in advanced chronic kidney disease: a real-world cohort study.

Kidney research and clinical practice·2026
Same author

Myeloid miR-155 deficiency exacerbates viral encephalitis by hindering M1 macrophage polarization due to impaired NLRP3 inflammasome activation in extraneural tissues.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Standardizing attenuation across tube voltages and vertebral levels for opportunistic osteoporosis screening on low-dose chest CT.

Radiology advances·2026
Same author

Integrative Pan-Cancer Mapping of Proteasome Dependency Prioritizes PSMB5 and PSMB6 as Context-Dependent Vulnerability Biomarkers Linked to Immune Context.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Hypothalamic POMC neurons regulate intestinal glucose absorption via a gut-brain circuit.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Association of Presepsis Statin Prescription With Kidney and Mortality Outcomes: Cause-Specific, Overlap-Weighted Analyses.

Kidney medicine·2026
Same journal

Externally Tested AI for Lung Nodule Classification: A Realistic Benchmark for an Emerging Screening Era.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Impact of Exposure Parameters on Deep Learning Models in Chest Radiography and Implications for Deployment.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Impact on Cost and Expert Time of Data-Efficient Deep Learning for Medical Image Segmentation.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking of AI and Radiologists for Indeterminate Lung Nodule Malignancy Risk Estimation on Screening CT: The LUNA25 Challenge.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

When One Sequence Is Enough-And When It Isn't.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Cracking the Registration Conundrum in Breast MRI: Preserving the Tumor Signal to Reveal True Treatment Change.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.7K

Bone Metastasis Detection at CT with Deep Learning Models Trained Using Multicenter, Multimodal Reference Standards:

Jung-Oh Lee1,2, Dong Hyun Kim3,4, Hee-Dong Chae1,4

  • 1Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Radiology. Artificial Intelligence
|March 25, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning models accurately detect bone metastases on CT scans, matching expert radiologist performance. A model trained on visible and indeterminate lesions showed superior recall, improving detection capabilities.

Keywords:
Abdomen/GIBody CTBone MetastasisCTComparative StudiesConvolutional Neural Network (CNN)Deep LearningMetastasesMultimodal Reference StandardsSegmentationSkeletal-AppendicularSkeletal/AxialSupervised LearningTechnology AssessmentThorax

More Related Videos

Multi-modal Imaging of Angiogenesis in a Nude Rat Model of Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Volumetric Computed Tomography and Ultrasound
12:23

Multi-modal Imaging of Angiogenesis in a Nude Rat Model of Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Volumetric Computed Tomography and Ultrasound

Published on: August 14, 2012

15.0K
Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy
06:45

Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy

Published on: November 28, 2025

264

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.7K
Multi-modal Imaging of Angiogenesis in a Nude Rat Model of Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Volumetric Computed Tomography and Ultrasound
12:23

Multi-modal Imaging of Angiogenesis in a Nude Rat Model of Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Volumetric Computed Tomography and Ultrasound

Published on: August 14, 2012

15.0K
Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy
06:45

Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy

Published on: November 28, 2025

264

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Bone metastases detection on CT scans is crucial for cancer staging and treatment.
  • Current detection methods rely on human interpretation, which can be variable and time-consuming.
  • Deep learning offers potential for automated and accurate metastasis detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate deep learning models for detecting bone metastases on abdominal and thoracic CT scans.
  • To assess the impact of lesion visibility (visible, indeterminate, invisible) on model performance.
  • To compare the performance of deep learning models against human readers (musculoskeletal radiologists and radiologists in training).

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective multicenter study using CT scans from patients with bone metastases.
  • MRI and PET-CT were used as reference standards to categorize lesions based on CT visibility.
  • Two nnU-Net deep learning models were trained: Model 1 (CT-visible metastases) and Model 2 (visible and indeterminate metastases).
  • Performance evaluated using lesion-level precision/recall and scan-level AUC, compared against human readers.

Main Results:

  • Model 2 demonstrated higher recall (41.8%) compared to Model 1 (33.9%) for all lesions.
  • Both models showed superior precision compared to radiologists in training (66.6%) and musculoskeletal radiologists (66.5%).
  • Model 2 achieved comparable recall (43.8%) and scan-level AUC (0.80) to expert radiologists.

Conclusions:

  • A deep learning model trained with multimodal reference standards achieved expert-level performance in detecting bone metastases on body CT.
  • The model's ability to incorporate indeterminate lesions enhances its detection capabilities.
  • Deep learning holds significant promise for improving the accuracy and efficiency of bone metastasis detection in clinical practice.