Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Genetically Engineered Mouse Models and Pathological Characterization of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Associated Tumors
Published on: May 17, 2024
Defining Prognostic Markers and Clinical Outcomes in Epithelioid Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor
Lee P Richman1, Phillip D Michaels1, Corrine Nief2
1Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract:
Epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (EMPNST) is recognized as a distinct entity in the 2026 World Health Organization classification, defined by characteristic morphology and frequent SMARCB1 (INI1) loss, which differentiates it from conventional MPNST. Limited data suggest EMPNST may have a more favorable prognosis, but prognostic markers remain undefined. We studied 78 primary EMPNSTs and compared them with 60 conventional MPNSTs. Patients with EMPNST included 41 females and 37 males, with a median age of 45 (range, 6-84) years. Necrosis was observed in 20% of cases, cytologic atypia was mild (25%), moderate (57%), or severe (18%), and mitoses ranged from 0 to 42/10 (median 7/10) high-power fields. SMARCB1 loss was observed in 81% of EMPNSTs and correlated with prominent nucleoli (64%, P < .001). EMPNSTs predominantly arose in the lower extremities, with 32% superficial, whereas conventional MPNSTs were mostly truncal. Targeted sequencing in 34 EMPNSTs identified SMARCB1 inactivation in 77% of cases, which was associated with SMARCB1 loss (P < .001), and recurrent alterations targeting 2q35/XRCC5 in 59% of cases. Among 34 patients with follow-up (median, 43 months; range, 0-225), 9 developed local recurrence, 15 metastases, and 10 died of disease. Compared with conventional MPNST, EMPNST demonstrated longer median progression-free survival (34 vs 19 months, P value for global difference of survival curves = .35); overall survival was not reached in EMPNST (vs 85 months in conventional MPNST, P value for global difference of survival curves = .16). In multivariable analysis, tumor size and mitotic rate were independently associated with poor prognosis (hazard ratio [HR], 5.2; 95% CI, 1.5-17.7; HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.01-1.2, respectively). A risk score integrating tumor size > 5 cm, mitoses > 7 of 10 high-power fields, and necrosis predicted poor outcomes (HR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.4-12). In conclusion, EMPNST tumor size and mitotic activity are key prognostic factors, supporting a simple risk stratification model. SMARCB1 inactivation is the most frequent genomic event, followed by gains at 2q35 potentially targeting XRCC5, highlighting molecular underpinnings for this distinct sarcoma subtype.
More Related Videos
09:33Author Spotlight: Finding New Therapeutic Targets for Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Through Genome-Scale shRNA Screens
Published on: August 25, 2023
07:10Orthotopic Xenografting of Human Luciferase-Tagged Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Cells for in vivo Testing of Candidate Therapeutic Agents
Published on: March 7, 2011