Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Preoxygenation Techniques for Tracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Adults Utilizing Oxygen Mask and Noninvasive Ventilation
Published on: December 5, 2025
Automatic alveolar ventilation-targeted NIV mode vs polysomnographic titration of fixed pressure in naive patients
Mónica Matute-Villacís1,2,3, Marta Puig Dupre4, Dunia Gascueña4
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Study Objectives:
Polysomnographic titration of fixed pressures of non-invasive ventilatory support (NIV) is recommended for patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CHRF). Here we compared the effects of NIV titrated manually by PSG vs. fully automatic mode (iVAPS AE) in sleep quality, respiratory events manually scored and estimated by built-in software, nocturnal hypoventilation, daytime arterial blood gases and patient comfort.
Methods:
We studied 26 adult patients (13 female) with CHRF due to COPD (n = 13), neuromuscular disease (n = 8), obesity hypoventilation syndrome (n = 3) and chest wall disorders (n = 2), all naïve to NIV. They were randomized to standard PSG titration of fixed NIV pressures or PSG using "learn target" iVAPS AE mode in two separate nights, both under PSG monitoring.
Results:
Main results showed that:(1) there were no significant differences in the reduction of diurnal PaCO2, nocturnal hypoventilation, sleep quality, upper airway obstruction events with both ventilatory modes; (2) the apnea-hypopnea index from built-in software underestimated that manually scored in both ventilatory modes; (3) ventilatory pressures were lower in fixed mode than iVAPS AE mode; (4) patient comfort was higher in fixed mode than iVAPS AE.
Conclusions:
This study shows that iVAPS AE initiated with the "learned target" procedure achieved similar short and long-term ventilatory efficacy to PSG manual bilevel titration. However, its higher pressure levels and lower comfort indicate that the modes are not fully equivalent. Moreover, underestimation of the AHI by the built-in software demands careful interpretation before changing ventilatory settings. Further studies are required to determine the long-term clinical relevance of these differences.
Clinical Trial Information:
This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the title "Evaluation of Conventional Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation (NIV) Versus an Automatic Ventilation Mode". URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03872167. Registration number: NCT03872167.
More Related Videos
05:39Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
06:57Use of an Integrated Low-Flow Anesthetic Vaporizer, Ventilator, and Physiological Monitoring System for Rodents
Published on: July 9, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management