Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

14:14
Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
14.9K
Historical Insights on Intentional Replantation for Tooth Retention Contrasted with Contemporary Practices
Bianca Magallanes1, Catalina Méndez2, James L Gutmann3
1Private Practice Limited to Endodontics Miami Lakes, Florida.
Summary
Intentional tooth replantation, a controversial dental procedure, involves reinserting a tooth after its removal. This article explores its historical and current pros and cons for retaining compromised teeth.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Endodontics
- Oral Surgery
Background:
- Intentional replantation is a dental procedure with a complex history.
- Its efficacy and indications remain debated among dental professionals.
- Often considered a last resort for saving compromised teeth.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the historical and contemporary literature on intentional tooth replantation.
- To analyze the advantages and disadvantages of this dental procedure.
- To provide a balanced perspective on its routine use.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of dental publications over the past 200+ years.
- Analysis of arguments from historical and present-day proponents and opponents.
- Synthesis of evidence regarding the pros and cons of intentional replantation.
Main Results:
- The procedure has a long history of debate, with varying degrees of acceptance.
- Both historical and modern literature present arguments for and against its use.
- The technique is frequently viewed as a final option for tooth retention.
Conclusions:
- Intentional replantation remains a technique with both advocates and detractors.
- A thorough understanding of its historical context and evidence is crucial.
- Further research may clarify its role in modern dental practice.
