Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
Published on: June 24, 2018
Differential Attachment of Engineered Oral Soft Tissues to Implant Surfaces
Nour Jalaleddine1, Emilia Barker2, Kirsty Franklin2
1Hamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Health, Dubai P.O. Box 505055, United Arab Emirates.
None:
Background/Objectives: The formation of a soft tissue seal through mucosal integration around dental implants is critical for potentially achieving long-term peri-implant health and clinical success. Understanding how different implant and abutment surfaces interact with individual layers of the oral mucosa remains limited. This study aimed to compare the differential attachment of tissue-engineered oral epithelium, connective tissue, and full-thickness human oral mucosa to various implant and abutment materials and surface topographies. Methods: Sand-blasted, large-grit, acid-etched (TiZr-SLA), machined TiZr (TiZr-M), machined zirconia (ZrO2-M), polished zirconia (ZrO2-P), and machined PEEK rods, along with commercially available titanium and ZrO2 healing abutments, were inserted into 3D oral mucosal models following a 4-mm punch biopsy. Inflammation was induced using Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. Analyses included histology, PrestoBlue viability assay, scanning electron microscopy, and ELISA quantification of cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8. Results: Epithelial attachment was greater on TiZr-SLA, ZrO2-P, and PEEK-M (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01) surfaces compared with TiZr-M and ZrO2-M. TiZr-SLA exhibited the highest connective tissue attachment (p < 0.05). Commercial titanium and ZrO2 healing abutments demonstrated the highest post-pull PrestoBlue viability and overall soft tissue attachment. SEM confirmed cell retention on all implant surfaces. Elevated IL-1β levels were detected in models exposed to ZrO2-M and PEEK-M, whereas IL-6 and IL-8 levels were not influenced by any material or surface topography. Conclusions: In vitro epithelial and connective tissue responses are influenced by implant material, surface topography, and design. Rough TiZr-SLA surfaces promote superior connective tissue attachment, while smooth commercial abutments support optimal overall soft tissue integration. These findings highlight the importance of surface engineering in preclinical optimization of peri-implant soft tissue attachment.

