Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Encouraging recovery or avoiding risk? A proposed clinical framework for rehabilitation decision-making after
Mariam A Ibrahim1, Hager Abdelzaher1, Ahmed Abdullah Alghamdi2
1Orthopedic and Trauma Rehabilitation Unit, Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery Department, Assiut University Trauma Hospital, Assiut, Egypt.
Abstract:
Fragility fractures are a major cause of morbidity, functional decline, and loss of independence in older adults. Although surgical management restores structural stability, postoperative outcomes are strongly influenced by the timing, intensity, and quality of rehabilitation. Contemporary guidelines advocate early mobilization, timely weight-bearing, and multidisciplinary orthogeriatric care; however, rehabilitation practice often remains overly cautious. Despite increasing evidence supporting early mobilization after fragility fractures, clinical rehabilitation pathways remain highly variable, contributing to delayed recovery, increased complications, prolonged hospitalization, and reduced quality of life. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on rehabilitation after fragility fractures and examines the persistent gap between evidence-based recommendations and real-world clinical practice. In addition, the review proposes a structured clinical decision-making framework designed to bridge the gap between evidence and orthopedic rehabilitation practice. A structured literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and EBSCO for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Priority was given to systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials addressing early mobilization, orthogeriatric co-management, fall prevention, and emerging rehabilitation strategies. The findings indicate that risk-averse rehabilitation practices are driven by interacting clinician-, patient-, and system-level factors. Clinician concerns about fixation stability, patient-related barriers such as pain, fear of falling, and cognitive impairment, and system-level constraints including limited geriatric rehabilitation pathways contribute to delayed mobilization. Based on these findings, a clinical framework integrating fixation stability, medical readiness, functional capacity, and environmental support is proposed to guide progressive and individualized rehabilitation after fragility fractures.
Related Concept Videos
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Restorative Care
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Bone Disorders
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...

