Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Early Out-of-Bed Rehabilitation After Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Shu-Mei Yang1, Hsing-Yu Chen2, Hsiao-Ting Tsai2
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-chu.
Objectives:
To determine whether out-of-bed rehabilitation within 48 hours after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large-vessel occlusion improves functional outcomes and motor recovery and to evaluate the safety of neurologic and immobility-related complications.
Design:
A randomized controlled trial.
Setting:
A tertiary medical center.
Participants:
Forty-two patients (N=42) who underwent EVT for anterior-circulation large-vessel occlusion and were stable within 48 hours after reperfusion were randomly assigned to early out-of-bed mobilization (EM; n=21) or usual care (UC; n=21) groups.
Interventions:
The EM group initiated progressive out-of-bed activities within 48 hours, and the UC group received conventional rehabilitation within 7 days. Both groups received 20-30-minute sessions twice daily, 5 d/wk.
Main Outcome Measures:
The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included mRS at 1 month, Barthel Index, and Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper extremity and lower-extremity at 1 and 3 months. Neurologic and immobility-related adverse events were monitored for 3 months.
Results:
At 3 months, no significant between-group difference in mRS was observed. Barthel Index scores were comparable at both follow-up time points. Exploratory analyses suggested greater motor recovery in the EM group. The mean between-group difference in Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper extremity was 7.13 points (95% CI, -0.98 to 15.24; P=.083) at 1 month and 12.20 points (95% CI, 1.21-23.19; P=.031) at 3 months, whereas the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the lower-extremity difference was 5.14 points (95% CI, 1.45-8.84; P=.008) at 1 month and 6.33 points (95% CI, 1.06-11.59; P=.020) at 3 months. Neurologic and immobility-related adverse events were infrequent and comparable.
Conclusions:
EM initiated within 48 hours after EVT was not associated with improved overall functional outcome but was safe and associated with notably greater upper and lower-extremity motor recovery compared with UC.
More Related Videos
08:53Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
06:04Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025