Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
Published on: February 19, 2021
Can 3D T1 Post-Contrast MRI in A Radiomics-Machine Learning Model Distinguish Infective from Neoplastic
Edwin Chong Yu Sng1,2, Minh Bao Kha3,4, Min Jia Wong5
1Department of Infectious Diseases, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street 3, Singapore 529889, Singapore.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Rapid and accurate classification of ring-enhancing brain lesions (REBLs) into infection or neoplasm is key to clinical triaging for expedited diagnostics in the former to enhance treatment outcomes, especially in the immunocompromised patients. High-resolution three-dimensional (3D) T1 post-contrast (T1+C) MRI provides high-dimensional volumetric data for radiomics analysis. While radiomics is useful in brain neoplasm characterization, its utility in central nervous system infection remains under-explored. In this exploratory study, we aim to determine if a radiomics-machine learning model, based solely on a 3D T1+C MRI dataset, can distinguish infective from neoplastic REBLs. Methods: 92 patients (infection, n = 26; neoplasm, n = 66) with 402 REBLs, who fulfilled criteria for "definite" or "probable" infective or neoplastic REBLs, were identified from scans performed at our hospital over four years and formed the training/validation dataset. All REBLs were manually annotated on T1+C MRI images under radiological supervision. In total, 1197 radiomics features were extracted, feature selection performed using mutual information, and nine machine learning classifiers applied to assess patient-level infection vs. neoplasm classification performance. End-to-end 2D CNN baselines and hybrid radiomics-CNN configurations were additionally evaluated under the same protocol for comparative benchmarking. Model performance was tested on an external holdout dataset of 57 patients (infection, n = 25; neoplasm, n = 32) with 454 REBLs from another hospital. Results: The Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) model using the Original + LoG + Wavelet feature group demonstrated superior performance. In the cross-validation cohort, it achieved a mean AUC of 0.80 ± 0.02, sensitivity of 0.83 ± 0.09, specificity of 0.77 ± 0.08, and balanced accuracy of 0.80 ± 0.02. On external holdout data, the same configuration showed stable and sustainable performance with an AUC of 0.84, sensitivity of 0.84, specificity of 0.75, and balanced accuracy of 0.80. Conclusions: Our radiomics-machine learning model, based solely on a high-resolution 3D T1+C dataset, shows potential for distinguishing infective REBLs from neoplastic REBLs. Further study, with additional MR sequences and clinical data in a multimodal MRI radiomics-machine learning model, is warranted.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...

