Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Longitudinal dispersion coefficient modeling in natural streams via newly proposed explainable ensemble learning
Vahid Nourani1, Sepehr Arvani2, Elnaz Sharghi2
1Center of Excellence in Hydroinformatics and Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51666-16471, Iran; Disaster Prevention Research Institute (DPRI), Kyoto University, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan; Altınbaş Cyprus University, Sht. Kemal Ali Omer St. No:22 Yenisehir, Nicosia/TRNC, via Mersin 10, Turkey.
Abstract:
Precise estimation of the longitudinal dispersion coefficient (Kₓ) is vital for pollutant transport modeling in rivers. In this study several Machine Learning (ML) models, including Feed Forward Neural Networks (FFNN), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) were used to estimate Kx. These three Ensemble learning (EL) techniques, of Simple Averaging Ensemble (SAE), Weighted Averaging Ensemble (WAE), and Neural Averaging Ensemble (NAE), were employed to combine the outputs of single models. The analysis utilized data from natural streams in the United States and the United Kingdom, incorporating variables such as channel width (W), flow depth (H), average velocity (U), and shear velocity (U⁎). Model interpretability was finally examined using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method, which identified W and H as the most influential estimators, but with different powers across models. Modeling performance evaluation using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Determination Coefficient (DC) metrics demonstrated that NAE achieved higher accuracy, reducing RMSE by 11% and improving DC by over 7% compared to Deep Learning (DL)-based CNN, the best-performing individual model. Stream-wise cross-validation (CV) results showed that FFNN could achieve the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC of 0.909), while ensemble techniques, especially WAE (AUC = 0.902 ± 0.016) and NAE (AUC = 0.886 ± 0.024), exhibited superior stability and generalization, consistently outperforming single models.
Related Concept Videos
Distribution and Dispersion
Typical Model Studies
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway
Uniform Depth Channel Flow: Problem Solving
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...

