Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Basophil Activation Test for Allergy Diagnosis
Published on: May 31, 2021
The shift towards lower-risk oral food challenges since the implementation of oral immunotherapy: a retrospective
Adam P Sage1,2, Min Jung Kim3, Tiffany Wong4,5
1Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. adam.sage@phsa.ca.
Insights
The adoption of oral immunotherapy (OIT) has improved the safety of oral food challenges (OFCs). Post-OIT, OFCs showed fewer positive reactions and reduced need for epinephrine, indicating enhanced patient safety during allergy testing.
Area of Science:
- Allergy and Immunology
- Clinical Pediatrics
- Food Allergy Research
Background:
- Oral food challenges (OFCs) previously demonstrated high rates of anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine (15.6%) at BC Children's Hospital (BCCH).
- The widespread adoption of oral immunotherapy (OIT) for food allergy treatment has led to significant changes in clinical practice regarding OFC indications and patient selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes and safety of OFCs performed before and after the implementation of OIT at BCCH.
- To evaluate the impact of OIT on the rate of positive OFCs and the severity of reactions.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective chart review of OFCs conducted from 2019-2021 (post-OIT era) at BCCH.
- Comparison of post-OIT data (n=590) with previously published pre-OIT data (2014-2017, n=353).
Main Results:
- Patients undergoing OFCs in the post-OIT era had significantly lower odds of positive OFCs (26.3% vs 32.6%, OR=0.738, p=0.0444).
- OFCs performed after maintenance OIT showed reduced odds of requiring epinephrine (8.31% vs 15.0%, OR=0.542, p=0.0164).
- A low incidence of severe reactions was observed, with only 6.10% of positive OFCs resulting in Grade 4 reactions.
Conclusions:
- Changes in clinical practice associated with OIT adoption have significantly improved the safety of OFCs.
- OIT implementation has led to a decrease in positive OFC outcomes and a reduction in the need for emergency interventions during OFCs.
Abstract:
We previously published data on the safety of oral food challenges (OFCs) at BC Children's Hospital (BCCH), which demonstrated high rates of anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine (15.6%). However, since the 2019 paper, the introduction of oral immunotherapy (OIT) for treatment of food allergies has been widely adopted at our center, resulting in significant practice changes in terms of when and for which patients to offer an OFC. As a result, we sought to compare outcomes of OFCs between the pre-OIT (2014-2017) and post-OIT (2019-2021) eras. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all OFCs completed 2019-2021 at BCCH (post-OIT, n = 590) and compared this to previously published data from OFCs between 2014-2017 (pre-OIT, n = 353). Relative to the pre-OIT cohort, we found patients undergoing OFCs to have significantly lower odds of positive OFCs (26.3% vs 32.6%, OR = 0.738, p = 0.0444). Further, OFCs completed after a period of maintenance OIT were found to have reduced odds of requiring epinephrine (8.31% vs 15.0%, OR = 0.542, p = 0.0164). We also observed a low severity in those with positive OFCs, with only 3/49 (6.10%) Grade 4 (severe) reactions. While multifactorial in etiology, we found changes in clinical practice with the adoption of OIT to be associated with a significant improvement in safety of OFCs preformed at our institution.
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Oral Drug Delivery Systems: Introduction
Taste Buds and Receptors
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
Development of the Oral Microbiota

