Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
Published on: January 11, 2018
Decoding adolescent TMJ osteoarthritis with multimodal machine learning
Yeon-Hee Lee1,2, Do-Hoon Kim3, Akhilanand Chaurasia4
1Department of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine, College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital, Kyung Hee University, 02447 Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background:
Early and accurate diagnosis of adolescent temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis (OA) is critical, as degenerative changes during growth can cause lifelong pain and deformity. This study aimed to identify key clinical and imaging predictors of adolescent TMJ-OA and to evaluate multimodal machine learning models.
Methods:
The diagnostic utility was evaluated in 79 adolescents (10-18 years) with TMJ pain using panoramic radiography (PR) and MRI. TMJ-OA was diagnosed based on the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Three decision tree models were developed: Model 1 (clinical-only), Model 2 (imaging-only), and Model 3 (combined clinical and imaging). Logistic regression was used for the comparisons.
Results:
To ensure a robust evaluation with a small sample size (n = 79), the models were assessed using nested 5-fold cross-validation. Model 2 (imaging only) had the highest specificity (0.7714 ± 0.2321), accuracy (0.5942 ± 0.0966), and AUROC (0.719 ± 0.101), but a low sensitivity (0.4472 ± 0.2065). PR evidence of TMJ-OA (feature importance = 0.70; OR = 3.93) was the strongest predictor and root node in the decision tree. Model 3 (combined clinical and imaging data) showed improved sensitivity (0.6056 ± 0.1829), identifying PR_TMJ_OA, MRI_TMJ_ADD (anterior disc displacement), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, and age as key nodes (AUROC = 0.6573 ± 0.0338; OR = 2.85 for PR_TMJ_OA). Model 1 (clinical-only) had limited predictive performance (AUROC = 0.4859 ± 0.0894), with symptom duration (importance = 0.64; OR = 1.40), VAS score, and joint locking (importance = 0.20) contributing modestly. A model using PR_TMJ_OA alone achieved perfect specificity (0.9714 ± 0.0571) but low sensitivity (0.3806 ± 0.1458).
Conclusions:
Although PR is a meaningful screening tool for adolescent TMJ-OA, it remains insufficient as a standalone diagnostic modality. Multimodal integration of clinical and MRI findings improves diagnostic accuracy and provides interpretable, clinically aligned decision-support tools for TMJ-OA.
Related Concept Videos
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
Classification of Bones
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...
Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
Knee Joint
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris...
Ankle Joint
Bone Remodeling and Repair

