Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

OLGA and OLGIM Stages for Predicting Metachronous Gastric Neoplasm After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients With Early Gastric Cancer Without a Current <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> Infection Status.

Journal of gastric cancer·2026
Same author

Real-World Evidence for Expanding the Criteria for Endoscopic Resection in Submucosal Gastric Cancer: The Role of Invasion Width.

Journal of gastric cancer·2026
Same author

Resurgence of Human Adenovirus Infections in the Korean Military Following the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Journal of Korean medical science·2026
Same author

Heat-related illness and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: causal inference using marginal structural models.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Long-Term Effect of Helicobacter pylori Eradication on Gastric Atrophy and Intestinal Metaplasia After Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Neoplasm: A Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Helicobacter·2026
Same author

Interactions Between <i>ADIPOQ</i> rs1501299 Polymorphism, Dietary Macronutrient Composition, and Gastric Cancer Risk: Evidence from a Korean Case-Control Study.

Journal of the American Nutrition Association·2026
Same journal

Explainable incremental-value analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient and arterial spin labeling radiomics for ATRX status prediction in glioblastoma.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same journal

Study-level factors associated with hematoma after ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast lesion excision: a systematic review and meta-analysis using a T-P-B framework.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same journal

Feasibility and strategy analysis of radiotherapy consolidation following immunotherapy for stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same journal

Anastomosing hemangioma of the kidney: a case report.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same journal

Machine learning-based prediction of prolonged air leak after uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery segmentectomy.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same journal

Past present and future of radiosensitization in cervical cancer.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
03:05

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Published on: February 16, 2024

1.7K

SHAP-explained machine-learning model for high-risk gastric cancer identification.

Hyun Jin Oh1, Chung Ho Kim2, Jae Kwan Jun3

  • 1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.

Frontiers in Oncology
|April 1, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new machine learning model accurately predicts 2-year gastric cancer risk using Helicobacter pylori status and endoscopic findings like atrophic gastritis. This tool aids in risk-adapted screening for better public health outcomes in Asia.

Keywords:
Helicobacter pyloriShapley Additive Explanationsatrophic gastritisgastric cancerintestinal metaplasiarisk prediction

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.9K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

858

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
03:05

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Published on: February 16, 2024

1.7K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.9K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

858

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Oncology
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Gastric cancer (GC) is a significant health issue, particularly in Asia.
  • Effective screening strategies are needed, considering regional factors like Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and precancerous lesions such as atrophic gastritis (AG) and intestinal metaplasia (IM).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a short-term (2-year) gastric cancer risk prediction model.
  • To integrate endoscopic findings (AG/IM) with demographic and lifestyle factors for improved risk assessment.
  • To compare the performance of machine learning models against conventional methods.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a large, real-world, nationwide screening cohort with AG/IM endoscopic codes.
  • Developed and compared risk prediction models using Cox proportional hazards model (CPHM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), decision tree (DT), and logistic regression (LR).
  • Evaluated model performance through internal and external validation, assessing discrimination and calibration. Employed Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) for model interpretability.

Main Results:

  • The XGBoost model exhibited superior performance in both internal (AUROC 0.764) and external (AUROC 0.708) validation.
  • SHAP analysis identified H. pylori infection, age, sex, smoking, and AG/IM as key predictors of gastric cancer risk.
  • The model demonstrated good discrimination and calibration, highlighting its potential clinical utility.

Conclusions:

  • An interpretable, externally validated 2-year GC risk model incorporating AG/IM findings offers a practical tool for risk-adapted screening.
  • This model can identify high-risk individuals for targeted surveillance and clinical review.
  • Understanding the key contributing factors through SHAP enhances the model's transparency and clinical applicability.