Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
Clinical Outcomes Following Open Tibial Fractures in Latin America: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Madeline C MacKechnie1, Jose Eduardo Quintero2, Rafael Amadei3
1Orthopaedic Trauma Institute, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
Initial intramedullary nailing for open tibial fractures in Latin America improved patient quality of life and fracture healing compared to staged fixation. This suggests a potential shift in treatment strategies for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Trauma Care
- Health Outcomes Research
Background:
- Open tibial fractures present significant challenges in achieving optimal health-related quality of life and fracture healing.
- Fixation methods play a crucial role in the recovery process for these complex injuries.
- Understanding regional variations in treatment and outcomes is vital for improving care in Latin America.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and fracture healing outcomes based on different fixation methods for isolated open tibial fractures.
- To evaluate the impact of initial definitive intramedullary nailing versus staged fixation strategies.
- To assess patient-reported outcomes using the SF-12 and radiographic union using the mRUST score.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 422 adult patients with isolated open tibial diaphyseal fractures across 18 trauma centers in 8 Latin American countries.
- Primary outcomes included Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the SF-12, assessed at baseline and multiple follow-up points up to 52 weeks.
- Secondary outcome was the modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial Fractures (mRUST) score, evaluated radiographically within 1 year postoperatively.
Main Results:
- Initial definitive intramedullary nailing was associated with significantly higher PCS and MCS scores at 1 year compared to staged fixation across all Gustilo-Anderson (GA) fracture types.
- Radiographic union scores (mRUST) at 1 year were significantly higher with initial definitive intramedullary nailing than with staged fixation.
- Deep contamination strongly correlated with the use of staged fixation, while minimal/superficial contamination did not influence the choice between initial or staged intramedullary nailing.
Conclusions:
- Initial intramedullary nailing demonstrates superior outcomes in terms of HRQoL (PCS/MCS scores) and fracture healing (mRUST scores) compared to staged fixation for open tibial fractures.
- Staged treatment remains a prevalent strategy in Latin America, even for less severe open tibial fractures.
- The findings support the consideration of initial definitive intramedullary nailing as a potentially more effective treatment for improving patient outcomes in open tibial fractures.
More Related Videos
11:21Development of a Novel Internal Fixation Model for Rat Radial Fractures: Fracture Healing Assessment and Dorsal Root Ganglion Isolation
Published on: March 13, 2026
07:24Autologous Microfractured and Purified Adipose Tissue for Arthroscopic Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus
Published on: January 23, 2018