Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

26.2K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.2K
Altruism01:03

Altruism

49.0K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
49.0K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

32.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.6K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

58.7K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
58.7K
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

7.6K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
7.6K
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.9K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Natureยท2026
Same author

Intervention to Promote Ethical Authorship Practices in Graduate Education.

Science and engineering ethicsยท2025
Same author

Developing faculty research mentors: Influence of experience with diverse mentees, gender, and mentorship training.

Accountability in researchยท2023
Same author

Authorship agreements benefit researchers and research culture.

Nature human behaviourยท2023
Same author

Why and how to incorporate issues of race/ethnicity and gender in research integrity education.

Accountability in researchยท2023
Same author

Getting along to get ahead: The role of social context in tournament promotion and reward systems.

PloS oneยท2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

10.0K

Faculty-student differences in authorship perceptions before and after authorship ethics interventions.

Elise Demeter1, George Banks2, Andrew McBride3,4

  • 1Office of Assessment and Accreditation, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Accountability in Research
|April 2, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Authorship norms in research teams are complex. This study found that training and policies improved awareness and attitudes toward ethical authorship, promoting integrity in scholarly work.

Keywords:
Authorshipcollaborationethics

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

10.0K

Area of Science:

  • Scholarly communication
  • Research ethics
  • Collaborative research

Background:

  • Authorship practices significantly impact fairness, responsibility, and accountability in collaborative research.
  • Understanding authorship norms and disagreements is crucial for maintaining research integrity.
  • Perceptions of authorship can vary based on researcher roles, gender, and discipline.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate prevailing authorship norms and disagreements in collaborative research.
  • To examine differences in authorship perceptions among faculty, students, genders, and disciplines.
  • To assess the impact of a three-year initiative on improving authorship ethics and policies.

Main Methods:

  • Surveys were administered to assess authorship norms, disagreements, and perceptions.
  • A follow-up survey was conducted after implementing training and an institutional authorship policy.
  • Data analysis focused on identifying systematic differences and changes over time.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences in authorship perceptions were found between faculty and students.
  • Specific researcher contributions were valued differently toward authorship credit.
  • Post-initiative surveys revealed notable shifts in awareness, expectations, and attitudes toward authorship ethics.

Conclusions:

  • Proactive education and institutional policymaking can effectively promote integrity in collaborative scholarly work.
  • These interventions can recalibrate local authorship norms and foster more ethical research environments.
  • Recommendations are provided for enhancing transparent authorship communication and ethical research practices.