Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.2K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.2K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.8K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.2K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.2K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.7K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.7K
Mathematical Modeling: Problem Solving01:29

Mathematical Modeling: Problem Solving

521
Mathematical modeling transforms real-world scenarios into mathematical expressions, allowing for structured problem-solving and analysis. This process involves defining the situation, assigning variables to measurable quantities, selecting an appropriate model, and solving the resulting equation. Such models are invaluable in finance, providing precise methods to evaluate investments, loans, and repayment structures.A widely used example is the calculation of fixed monthly payments on a loan,...
521
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

72
PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure...
72

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

Examining the signal-detection account of visual working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

ERP effects at encoding: Image memorability or recognition success?

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same author

Image memorability is linked to facilitated perceptual and semantic processing.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Decision making under extinction risk.

Cognitive psychology·2025
Same author

Critical testing in recognition memory: Selective influence, single-item generalization, and the high-threshold hypothesis.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.6K

Toward the cognitive modeling of dynamic decision making.

Will Deng1, David Kellen2, Jared M Hotaling3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|April 2, 2026
PubMed
Summary

This study explores complex, sequential decision-making, finding distinct individual strategies in managing dynamic choices. Understanding these patterns improves models of risky decision making.

Keywords:
Backward inductionCognitive modelsDecision field theoryDynamic decision making

More Related Videos

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

14.5K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.6K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

14.5K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Most risky decision-making research examines simple, isolated choices.
  • Real-world decisions often involve complex, interdependent sequences of events.
  • Understanding dynamic, multistage decision-making processes is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how individuals manage complex, dynamic decision-making.
  • To combine preference modeling with cognitive modeling for deeper insights.
  • To identify distinct behavioral and cognitive profiles in decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized true-and-error models to analyze preference distributions and stability.
  • Employed cognitive modeling based on Decision Field Theory (DFT).
  • DFT offers a unified framework for testing hypotheses on information gathering and future planning.

Main Results:

  • Identified distinct groups of individuals based on decision-making patterns.
  • Analysis revealed variations in planning, strategy shifts, and information processing.
  • Behavioral and cognitive factors differentiated these groups.

Conclusions:

  • Individuals exhibit diverse approaches to dynamic decision-making.
  • Factors like planning depth and information sampling bias are key differentiators.
  • Findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of complex choices.