Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Measuring the Influence of Magnetic Vestibular Stimulation on Nystagmus, Self-Motion Perception, and Cognitive Performance in a 7T MRT
Published on: March 3, 2023
3D Heavily T2-Weighted Imaging of Inner Ear and Internal Auditory Canal at 3T vs 5T: A Comparative Study
Siwei Yang1, Yan Huang1, Furen Guo1
1From the Department of Radiology (S.Y., Y.H., F.G., B.Y., R.T., Z.W., P.Z.), Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Background And Purpose:
The inner ear is characterized by fine and intricate anatomy. Due to magnetic inhomogeneity, inner ear imaging has not benefited much from ultra-high-field-strength MRI. 5T may provide an alternative for inner ear imaging. This study aimed to compare image quality and visibility of specific structures between 5T and 3T MRI.
Materials And Methods:
Consecutive healthy volunteers, who underwent heavily T2-weighted imaging at 3T and 5T within 1 week, were prospectively enrolled between September and October 2025. Image quality was rated using the Likert scale for overall image and specifically the inner ear and nerve apparatus. SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and image sharpness were quantitated. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests or paired t tests were used for interfield comparison. Interobserver and interfield agreements were assessed.
Results:
A total of 22 participants (median age: 40.50 [30.00-49.00] years; 10 women; 44 ears) were included. There was no observed difference in overall image quality between 5T and 3T across 3 readers (average median scores: both 4.67; P > .999). Compared with 3T, 5T demonstrated a superior visibility for the posterior ampullary nerve, superior vestibular nerve, cochlear nerve (CN), and cochlear aperture segment of CN, as well as foramen singulare and osseous spiral lamina. The visibility score of the inferior vestibular nerve was marginally higher at 5T than that at 3T for readers (P = .054-.094). No differences in visualizing evaluated membranous labyrinth structures between 2 field strengths were observed. SNR, CNR, and image sharpness were higher at 5T than at 3T.
Conclusions:
Compared with 3T, a 3D heavily T2-weighted sequence at 5T improved the detectability of nerves significantly, particularly segments coursing through bony ducts, as well as the foramen singulare and osseous spiral lamina.
More Related Videos
10:27In Vivo Morphometric Analysis of Human Cranial Nerves Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Menière's Disease Ears and Normal Hearing Ears
Published on: February 21, 2018
09:47A Methodological Protocol and Considerations for Transcranial Ultrasonic Stimulation in Exploratory Clinical Human Studies
Published on: December 12, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Anatomy of the Ear
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging