Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Steps in Outbreak Investigation01:18

Steps in Outbreak Investigation

704
In the ever-evolving field of public health, statistical analysis serves as a cornerstone for understanding and managing disease outbreaks. By leveraging various statistical tools, health professionals can predict potential outbreaks, analyze ongoing situations, and devise effective responses to mitigate impact. For that to happen, there are a few possible stages of the analysis:
704

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Triglyceride glucose index versus triglyceride glucose-BMI index in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A correlation with steatosis and fibrosis.

Bioinformation·2026
Same author

Response to "Accuracy or Agreement? Reconsidering the Use of AI as a Reference Standard in Head CT Reformatting".

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same author

Safety and Effectiveness of Two Reconstitution Volumes of Poly-L-Lactic Acid for Correction of Décolletage Wrinkles.

Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD·2026
Same author

Continuous production of recombinant adeno-associated virus in the insect cell/baculovirus expression vector system.

Molecular therapy. Advances·2026
Same author

Beyond the Petri Dish: The Performance of a Multiplex PCR-Based Pneumonia Panel in Hospitalized Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infection.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Trends in Posterior Malleolus Fixation and Subsequent Syndesmotic Repair in Trimalleolar Ankle Fractures.

Journal of orthopaedic trauma·2026
Same journal

Program signaling in the integrated interventional radiology residency match: A cross-sectional survey of program directors.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same journal

ACR BI-RADS<sup>Ⓡ</sup> v2025: A summary of changes.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same journal

Predominantly middle authors in radiology: a bibliometric assessment.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same journal

Radiology's carbon footprint: Why environmental harm remains outside clinical responsibility.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same journal

The imaging dilemma of solid serous cystadenomas, PNETs, and vascular pancreatic metastases: Challenges and diagnostic strategies.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same journal

Awareness, discussion, and understanding of interventional radiology Procedures among non-interventional radiology medical providers on X: A social media infodemiology study.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.9K

Predicting radiology no-shows with machine learning: Methodological pitfalls and practical considerations.

David Fussell1, Justin Ling2, Ziyue Wang3

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of California, Irvine, 836 Health Sciences Road, Suite 4021, Irvine, CA 92617, USA.

Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
|April 2, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Developing machine learning (ML) models to predict radiology appointment no-shows faces practical challenges. Real-world data issues like quality and leakage risk creating flawed predictive models.

Keywords:
Appointments and SchedulesData AnalysisMachine LearningRadiologySocial Determinants of Health

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.9K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Operational Efficiency

Background:

  • Radiology appointment no-shows and late cancellations disrupt patient care and cause financial losses.
  • Developing robust no-show prediction models in large health systems presents significant practical challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the methodological hurdles encountered in building outpatient radiology no-show prediction models at a large academic medical center.
  • To identify key predictors and data-related challenges in developing reliable no-show prediction models.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a dataset of 334,002 outpatient imaging appointments, integrating EHR data with external weather, socioeconomic, and geographic information.
  • Employed preprocessing techniques for cohort selection, feature engineering, and addressing class imbalance and data leakage.
  • Trained boosted tree classifiers and other algorithms on 2022-2023 data and tested on 2024 data.

Main Results:

  • The best models achieved an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.71.
  • Identified challenges including ambiguous data definitions, distinguishing cancellations from reschedules, and variable data quality.
  • Found phone reminder status, appointment confirmation, and modality to be key predictors, while crime, income, and weather had limited utility.

Conclusions:

  • Building effective no-show prediction models necessitates extensive data cleaning, feature engineering, and temporal validation.
  • Real-world data constraints pose risks of flawed models due to leakage, inconsistencies, and confounding factors.
  • Successful deployment requires transparent documentation, rigorous validation, and critical data quality assessments beyond algorithmic sophistication.