Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

08:34
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
21.3K
Fluence-corrected pencil beam algorithm for carbon ion therapy patient quality assurance in solid phantoms
Yunzhou Xia1, Kai Wang2, Qinqin Cheng1
1Department of Medical Management, Chinese Academy of Science Heavy Ion Medicine (CASHIM) Co. Ltd., Beijing, 100190, China.
Summary
This study introduces a fluence-corrected pencil beam algorithm (PBA) for accurate carbon ion therapy quality assurance (QA) in solid phantoms. This method improves dose accuracy, especially at greater depths, simplifying patient-specific QA at Heavy Ion Medical Machine (HIMM) centers.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Computational Imaging
Background:
- Solid phantoms simplify carbon ion therapy quality assurance (QA) but introduce dose deviations due to algorithms calculating dose in water.
- Accurate patient-specific QA is crucial for effective carbon ion therapy, particularly at Heavy Ion Medical Machine (HIMM) centers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a fluence-corrected pencil beam algorithm (PBA) for accurate dose calculation in solid phantoms.
- To enable precise patient-specific QA directly within solid phantoms, overcoming limitations of water-based calculations.
Main Methods:
- Modeled carbon ion beams using TOPAS Monte Carlo simulations to match clinical commissioning data.
- Derived energy- and depth-dependent fluence correction (FC) factors (FCFs) from simulated depth-dose data in solid phantoms and water.
- Validated FCFs experimentally and integrated them into the PBA for QA workflow comparisons.
Main Results:
- Simulated FCFs increased with energy and depth, showing good agreement with experimental measurements (within ±0.5%).
- Gamma pass rates significantly improved for depths > 100 mm using the fluence-corrected PBA (workflows 2-4), reaching up to 99% under 2 mm/2% criteria.
- Workflow 2 (phantom CT with FC) and workflow 4 (virtual CT with phantom SPR and FC) yielded comparable results.
Conclusions:
- Fluence correction factors (FCFs) are essential for carbon ion therapy QA in solid phantoms, particularly beyond 100 mm depth.
- The developed fluence-corrected PBA or a simplified correction table can be used on virtual phantoms for efficient QA.
- This advancement supports easier and more accurate patient-specific QA in carbon ion therapy.

