Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CTSS regulates macrophage lipid metabolic reprogramming and white matter repair after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Journal of translational medicine·2026
Same author

AI-assisted Radiomic Model for Cervical Cancer Recurrence Prediction: A Multicenter Retrospective Study with Experimental Validation.

Radiology. Imaging cancer·2026
Same author

Effect of histology on the efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

LRG1 as a Potential Therapeutic Target in Atherosclerosis: Mechanistic Basis and Current Evidence.

Cells·2026
Same author

Influencing factors of significant breast edema in breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery during radiotherapy with DIBH.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same author

Interpretable Deep Learning with Multi-Scale CT for Predicting Occult Lymph Node Metastasis in Early-Stage NSCLC: A Multicenter Study.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Image Quality with Iterative Reconstruction: A NEMA Phantom Study.

Journal of medical physics·2026
Same journal

Plan Complexity Metric Based Patient Specific Quality Assurance Outcome Prediction Across Two Machines.

Journal of medical physics·2026
Same journal

Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance-based Synthetic Computed Tomography for Proton Dose Calculation in Prostate Cancer.

Journal of medical physics·2026
Same journal

Technical Note: An Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface-based Tool for Automated Structure Duplication, Cropping, and Ring Generation in Eclipse Treatment Planning System.

Journal of medical physics·2026
Same journal

Machine Learning-based Prediction of Mean Heart Dose and Deep Inspiration Breath-hold Selection in Left-sided Breast Cancer Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Radiotherapy Planning.

Journal of medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-institutional Comparison of Novel O-ring Linac Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Fan Beam Computed Tomography.

Journal of medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

16.3K

Reevaluating Backup Monitor Chamber Tolerances for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Treatments using

Yong Sang1, Jun Dang1, Jianan Wu1

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital and Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.

Journal of Medical Physics
|April 6, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The 2% constancy tolerance for backup monitor chambers in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may cause errors. A tighter tolerance, near 0.0%, is recommended for Elekta Infinity accelerators to improve SBRT safety and efficacy.

Keywords:
American Association of Physicists in Medicine’s task group 142backup monitor chamberstereotactic body radiation therapyvolumetric-modulated arc therapy

More Related Videos

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
08:54

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Published on: May 8, 2018

15.2K
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
10:35

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer

Published on: April 17, 2012

18.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

16.3K
Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
08:54

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Published on: May 8, 2018

15.2K
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
10:35

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer

Published on: April 17, 2012

18.9K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Quality Assurance

Background:

  • Backup monitor chambers in linear accelerators ensure radiation dose accuracy and safety.
  • Current 2% constancy tolerance may be insufficient for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) due to high monitor units (MUs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate backup monitor chamber constancy in SBRT VMAT treatments on an Elekta Infinity accelerator.
  • To determine if current tolerances ensure treatment efficacy and safety.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of five SBRT patients treated with VMAT.
  • Deviations between primary (MU1) and backup (MU2) MUs were recorded at various tolerance levels (1.5% to -1.5%).
  • Impact of gantry angle and field size on MU2 readings was assessed.

Main Results:

  • All SBRT plans had errors at 1.5% tolerance; errors persisted at 1.0% and 0.5% for high-MU cases.
  • No errors were reported at 0.0% and -1.5% tolerance settings.
  • Minor gantry angle variations slightly affected MU2 readings; field size had no significant impact.

Conclusions:

  • The 2% constancy tolerance is likely suboptimal for SBRT on the Elekta Infinity.
  • A tolerance closer to 0.0% is recommended to minimize delivery errors and enhance patient safety.
  • Further validation across different accelerators and patient groups is necessary.