Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Induced Electric Fields: Applications01:27

Induced Electric Fields: Applications

2.9K
An important distinction exists between the electric field induced by a changing magnetic field and the electrostatic field produced by a fixed charge distribution. Specifically, the induced electric field is nonconservative because it does not work in moving a charge over a closed path. In contrast, the electrostatic field is conservative and does no net work over a closed path. Hence, electric potential can be associated with the electrostatic field but not the induced field. The following...
2.9K
Electrostatic Boundary Conditions in Dielectrics01:27

Electrostatic Boundary Conditions in Dielectrics

2.1K
When an electric field passes from one homogeneous medium to another, crossing the boundary between the two mediums imparts a discontinuity in the electric field. This results in electrostatic boundary conditions that depend on the type of mediums the field propagates through.
Consider a case where both the mediums across a boundary are two different dielectric materials. Recall that the electric field and electric displacement are proportional and related through the material's permittivity....
2.1K
Electrostatic Boundary Conditions01:16

Electrostatic Boundary Conditions

1.2K
Consider an external electric field propagating through a homogeneous medium. When the electric field crosses the surface boundary of the medium, it undergoes a discontinuity. The electric field can be resolved into normal and tangential components. The amount by which the field changes at any boundary is given by the difference between the field components above and below the surface boundary.
The surface integral of an electric field is given by Gauss's law in integral form and is related to...
1.2K
Induced Electric Fields01:23

Induced Electric Fields

5.1K
The fact that emfs are induced in circuits implies that work is being done on the conduction electrons in the wires. What can possibly be the source of this work? We know that it’s neither a battery nor a magnetic field, as a battery does not have to be present in a circuit where current is induced, and magnetic fields never do any work on moving charges. The source of the work is in fact an electric field that is induced in the wires. For example, if a stationary conductor is placed in a...
5.1K
Magnetic Force Between Two Parallel Currents01:13

Magnetic Force Between Two Parallel Currents

5.1K
Two long, straight, and parallel current-carrying conductors exert a force of equal magnitude on one another. The direction of the force depends on the current direction in the conductors.
The force exerted by the magnetic field due to the first conductor over a finite length of the second conductor is given as the product of the current in the second conductor and  the vector product of the length vector along the current element and the field due to the first conductor. According to the...
5.1K
Finding Electric Potential From Electric Field01:13

Finding Electric Potential From Electric Field

6.3K
For a system of charges, it is easy to calculate the system's potential because potential is a scalar quantity. However, in some instances where calculating the electric field is more straightforward than finding the potential, the electric field is used to calculate the system's potential. For a positive charge, the electric field is radially outward, and the potential is positive at any finite distance from the positive charge. In such an electric field, the motion away from the...
6.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Low-Temperature xTB-MD-DFT Screening of Functionalized Oxide Surface-Patch Models (TiO<sub>2</sub>, ZnO, CeO<sub>2</sub>) for Hydrocarbon Association and Microbial-Proxy Perturbation Assessment in Cold Bioremediation.

Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Low-Load endoluminal navigation with a magnetically actuated medical soft microrobot.

Frontiers in medical technology·2026
Same author

Volume isn't openness: misaligned assessment and Open Science adoption in Ecuador.

Frontiers in research metrics and analytics·2026
Same author

Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Green Synthesis and Their Antimicrobial Activity.

Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Population structure of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates in Colombia.

Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2020
Same author

Active and latent tuberculosis among inmates in La Esperanza prison in Guaduas, Colombia.

PloS one·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Voltage Biasing, Cyclic Voltammetry, & Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy for Neural Interfaces
07:51

Voltage Biasing, Cyclic Voltammetry, & Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy for Neural Interfaces

Published on: February 24, 2012

25.3K

A dual-track, physics-informed framework for predicting TENG open circuit voltage and short circuit current.

Julio Guerra1, Gerardo Collaguazo1, Isabel Quinde1

  • 1Faculty of Engineering in Applied Sciences, Universidad Técnica del Norte, Ibarra 100101, Ecuador.

Iscience
|April 6, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Predicting triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) output is challenging. This study introduces a dual-track framework combining physics-based modeling and machine learning for accurate TENG performance prediction and design optimization.

Keywords:
computational materials scienceelectrical materialsmachine learningmaterials science

More Related Videos

Preparation of ZnO Nanorod/Graphene/ZnO Nanorod Epitaxial Double Heterostructure for Piezoelectrical Nanogenerator by Using Preheating Hydrothermal
10:39

Preparation of ZnO Nanorod/Graphene/ZnO Nanorod Epitaxial Double Heterostructure for Piezoelectrical Nanogenerator by Using Preheating Hydrothermal

Published on: January 15, 2016

13.1K
Measurement of Bioelectric Current with a Vibrating Probe
07:28

Measurement of Bioelectric Current with a Vibrating Probe

Published on: January 4, 2011

14.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Voltage Biasing, Cyclic Voltammetry, & Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy for Neural Interfaces
07:51

Voltage Biasing, Cyclic Voltammetry, & Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy for Neural Interfaces

Published on: February 24, 2012

25.3K
Preparation of ZnO Nanorod/Graphene/ZnO Nanorod Epitaxial Double Heterostructure for Piezoelectrical Nanogenerator by Using Preheating Hydrothermal
10:39

Preparation of ZnO Nanorod/Graphene/ZnO Nanorod Epitaxial Double Heterostructure for Piezoelectrical Nanogenerator by Using Preheating Hydrothermal

Published on: January 15, 2016

13.1K
Measurement of Bioelectric Current with a Vibrating Probe
07:28

Measurement of Bioelectric Current with a Vibrating Probe

Published on: January 4, 2011

14.7K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Electrical Engineering
  • Energy Harvesting

Background:

  • Triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs) show promise for self-powered sensing and energy harvesting.
  • Predicting TENG output is difficult due to device heterogeneity and varied reporting standards.
  • Standardized prediction methods are needed for reliable TENG design and comparison.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust framework for predicting TENG performance (Voc, Isc).
  • To establish actionable design rules for optimizing TENGs.
  • To enable reproducible comparisons across diverse TENG studies.

Main Methods:

  • A dual-track approach: a closed-form surrogate model based on Thevenin load matching and a machine learning predictor.
  • Training the machine learning model using leave-one-study-out validation on a harmonized corpus of 20 studies (443 conditions).
  • Incorporating uncertainty quantification and study-level robustness checks.

Main Results:

  • Accurate prediction of open-circuit voltage (Voc) and short-circuit current (Isc) with calibrated prediction intervals.
  • Estimation of key internal parameters like resistance, capacitance, and charge density.
  • Identification of design rules, such as optimal load matching to internal resistance.

Conclusions:

  • The framework enables physics-guided prediction and design of TENG systems.
  • It facilitates reproducible performance comparisons across different TENG studies.
  • The approach supports the advancement of TENGs for practical applications in energy harvesting and sensing.