Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
Published on: September 5, 2019
The lexical boost in structural priming: The syntactic head matters but adjacency does not
Roger P G van Gompel1, Robert J Hartsuiker2, Leila Kantola1
1Division of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Dundee.
Structural priming research supports head-centered models. Repeating the head verb boosts priming, while repeating nonhead subjects does not, regardless of word position in sentences.
Area of Science:
- Psycholinguistics
- Cognitive Science
- Computational Linguistics
Background:
- Structural priming research suggests priming effects are stronger when the head of a structure is repeated.
- Previous studies indicated that lexical boost effects, where head word repetition enhances priming, are significant.
- However, the influence of word position on head versus nonhead word effects remained unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of word position in head-centered structural priming.
- To determine if the lexical boost effect is specific to head words, irrespective of their sentence position.
- To provide further evidence for or against head-centered models of structural priming.
Main Methods:
- Experimental design manipulating word order in prime and target sentences.
- Comparison of priming effects with repeated head verbs versus repeated nonhead subjects.
- Analysis of structural priming strength based on lexical repetition.
Main Results:
- Repetition of the head verb consistently resulted in a lexical boost effect.
- Repetition of the nonhead subject did not significantly affect structural priming.
- These findings held true even when the typical sentence order of head and nonhead words was reversed.
Conclusions:
- The results strongly support head-centered models of structural priming.
- Lexical boost effects are primarily associated with head words, independent of their position.
- The study clarifies the differential impact of head and nonhead word repetition on structural priming.
More Related Videos
08:17A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential ERP Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published on: April 12, 2018
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
Related Concept Videos
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Framing Effects
Structuralism
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He...
Conjugate Addition (1,4-Addition) vs Direct Addition (1,2-Addition)
Conjugate addition results in a thermodynamically stable product. The reaction retains the stronger C=O bond at the expense of the weaker C=C π bond. The process is slow as the β carbon is less electrophilic than the carbonyl carbon.
Direct addition products are...
Components of Language