Linear Spherical Sliced Optimal Transport: A Fast Metric for Comparing Spherical Data.
Xinran Liu1, Yikun Bai1, Rocío Díaz Martín2
1Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37240.
Summary
Linear Spherical Sliced Optimal Transport (LSSOT) offers a computationally efficient way to compare spherical probability distributions. This new framework preserves geometric properties, improving accuracy in applications like computer vision and medical imaging.
Area of Science:
- Computational geometry
- Probability theory
- Machine learning
Background:
- Comparing spherical probability distributions is crucial in computer vision, geosciences, and medicine.
- Existing methods like spherical sliced Wasserstein distances reduce computational cost but may not fully preserve geometry.
- Linear optimal transport embeds distributions into L^2 spaces for simpler comparisons.
Purpose of the Study:
- Introduce the Linear Spherical Sliced Optimal Transport (LSSOT) framework.
- Develop a computationally efficient metric for spherical probability measures that preserves intrinsic geometry.
- Demonstrate LSSOT's effectiveness in various applications.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing slicing techniques to embed spherical distributions into L^2 spaces.
- Leveraging linear optimal transport principles.
- Establishing the metricity of the proposed LSSOT framework.
Main Results:
- LSSOT provides a computationally efficient metric for spherical probability measures.
- The framework preserves the intrinsic geometry of spherical distributions.
- Demonstrated superior computational efficiency and high accuracy in applications like cortical surface registration and 3D point cloud interpolation.
Conclusions:
- LSSOT offers significant computational benefits and high accuracy for comparing spherical distributions.
- The framework effectively preserves geometric properties, making it suitable for complex applications.
- LSSOT represents a promising advancement in the field of optimal transport for spherical data.
Related Concept Videos
Spherical Coordinates
16.9K
Spherical coordinate systems are preferred over Cartesian, polar, or cylindrical coordinates for systems with spherical symmetry. For example, to describe the surface of a sphere, Cartesian coordinates require all three coordinates. On the other hand, the spherical coordinate system requires only one parameter: the sphere's radius. As a result, the complicated mathematical calculations become simple. Spherical coordinates are used in science and engineering applications like electric and...
16.9K
Gauss's Law: Spherical Symmetry
10.0K
A charge distribution has spherical symmetry if the density of charge depends only on the distance from a point in space and not on the direction. In other words, if the system is rotated, it doesn't look different. For instance, if a sphere of radius R is uniformly charged with charge density ρ0, then the distribution has spherical symmetry. On the other hand, if a sphere of radius R is charged so that the top half of the sphere has a uniform charge density ρ1 and the bottom half has a...
10.0K
Polar and Cylindrical Coordinates
22.4K
The Cartesian coordinate system is a very convenient tool to use when describing the displacements and velocities of objects and the forces acting on them. However, it becomes cumbersome when we need to describe the rotation of objects. So, when describing rotation, the polar coordinate system is generally used.
22.4K
Radius of Gyration of an Area
3.1K
The second moment of area, also known as the moment of inertia of area, is a crucial factor in understanding an object's resistance against bending deformation, or stiffness. To accurately estimate the second moment of area along any axis, one needs to concentrate all areas associated with that object into a thin strip, which should be placed parallel to that particular axis.
3.1K
Gauss's Law: Cylindrical Symmetry
10.1K
A charge distribution has cylindrical symmetry if the charge density depends only upon the distance from the axis of the cylinder and does not vary along the axis or with the direction about the axis. In other words, if a system varies if it is rotated around the axis or shifted along the axis, it does not have cylindrical symmetry. In real systems, we do not have infinite cylinders; however, if the cylindrical object is considerably longer than the radius from it that we are interested in,...
10.1K
Gravity between Spherical Bodies
9.8K
Newton's law of gravitation describes the gravitational force between any two point masses. However, for extended spherical objects like the Earth, the Moon, and other planets, the law holds with an assumption that masses of spherical objects are concentrated at their respective centers.
This assumption can be proved easily by showing that the expression for gravitational potential energy between a hollow sphere of mass (M) and a point mass (m) is the same as it would be for a pair of extended...
This assumption can be proved easily by showing that the expression for gravitational potential energy between a hollow sphere of mass (M) and a point mass (m) is the same as it would be for a pair of extended...
9.8K


