Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Severe Aortic Stenosis Is Associated With Left Atrial Prothrombotic Flow That Persists Despite Valve Replacement
Marco Spartera1,2, Antonio Stracquadanio1,2, Ludovica Bognoni1,2
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine University of Oxford United Kingdom.
Background:
Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with ischemic stroke independently of atrial fibrillation or other causes. Even after aortic valve replacement (AVR), patients remain affected by a 6% 5-year stroke rate with knowledge gaps in the underlying pathophysiology. We hypothesize that severe AS is associated with prothrombotic left atrial (LA) flow changes that do not normalize after AVR.
Methods:
Seventy-seven participants without atrial fibrillation were recruited: 40 with severe AS (median age, 73 years; CHA2DS2VASc score, 3) and 37 controls with similar risk profile (median age, 71 years; CHA2DS2VASc score, 3). All underwent baseline cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Among the 40 patients with AS, 23 (58%) underwent AVR and repeat cardiac magnetic resonance imaging ≈6 months after surgery.
Results:
Compared with controls, patients with severe AS displayed significantly higher left ventricular (LV) mass (P=0.04), smaller LV volumes (P=0.01), and reduced global longitudinal strain (P<0.001). Although LA volume was within the normal range and LA emptying fraction was not different from controls, severe AS was associated with lower LA peak flow velocity (mean, 0.25 versus 0.28 m/s, respectively; P=0.02) and lower LA flow vorticity (mean, 16.6 versus 21.1 radians; P<0.001) compared with controls. AVR led to regression of LV hypertrophy with LV mass that was no longer different from controls (P=0.32). Nevertheless, post-AVR patients displayed a persistent adverse morpho-functional phenotype characterized by persistently lower velocity (mean, 0.24 versus 0.28 m/s; P=0.003) and vorticity (17.1 versus 21.1 radians; P<0.001) compared with controls.
Conclusions:
Patients with severe AS display adverse prothrombotic LA flow characteristics that persist after successful AVR despite general regression of LV hypertrophy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

