Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

10.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
10.0K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

8.1K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
8.1K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

5.0K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
5.0K
What Are Outliers?01:12

What Are Outliers?

5.7K
Outliers are observed data points that are far from the least squares line. They have unusual values and need to be examined carefully. Though an outlier may result from erroneous data, at other times, it may hold valuable information about the population under study and should be included in the data. Hence, it is crucial to examine what causes a data point to be an outlier.
The z score is used to find outliers or unusual values. It should be noted that any values beyond -2 and +2 are...
5.7K
Outliers and Influential Points01:08

Outliers and Influential Points

6.8K
An outlier is an observation of data that does not fit the rest of the data. It is sometimes called an extreme value. When you graph an outlier, it will appear not to fit the pattern of the graph. Some outliers are due to mistakes (for example, writing down 50 instead of 500), while others may indicate that something unusual is happening. Outliers are present far from the least squares line in the vertical direction. They have large "errors," where the "error" or residual is the...
6.8K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

12.2K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
12.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dual responsive enzyme mimicking activity of AgX (X=Cl, Br, I) nanoparticles and its application for cancer cell detection.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2014
Same author

Naphthoquinone-directed C-H annulation and C(sp³)-H bond cleavage: one-pot synthesis of tetracyclic naphthoxazoles.

The Journal of organic chemistry·2014
Same author

Pulmonary toxicity in mice following exposure to cerium chloride.

Biological trace element research·2014
Same author

Role of surgery in the treatment of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma who have a poor response to induction chemotherapy.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2014
Same author

Glutathione-S-transferase polymorphisms (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1) and acute leukemia risk in Asians: a meta-analysis.

Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP·2014
Same author

Influence of casting solvent on phenyl ordering at the surface of spin cast polymer thin films.

Journal of colloid and interface science·2014
Same journal

Change-Prior-Guided Unsupervised Change Detection of Heterogeneous Remote Sensing Images.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same journal

AgonicDreamer: Enhancing Multi-View Consistency in Text-to-3D Generation via Rectified Score Distillation.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same journal

BiCM-Prompt: Bidirectional Cross-Modal Prompt Tuning for Class-Incremental Learning on Multisource Remote Sensing Images.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same journal

GoP-based Quality Enhancement on Video Compression.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same journal

Align then Tensorize: Multi-Level Consistent Anchor Graph Learning for Scalable Multi-View Clustering.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fidelity: Diverse Image Synthesis via Retrieval-Augmented Diffusion.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.2K

Sharpness-Aware Fine-Tuning for OOD Detection.

Chi Zhang, Wei Wang, Yao Zhao

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing : a Publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society
    |April 9, 2026
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Sharpness-aware Minimization (SAM) enhances out-of-distribution (OOD) detection by improving model generalization. Fine-tuning with SAM effectively separates in-distribution and OOD data scores, achieving state-of-the-art results efficiently.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

    Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
    03:31

    Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

    Published on: December 15, 2023

    1.2K

    Area of Science:

    • Machine Learning
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Computer Science

    Background:

    • Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is vital for reliable machine learning deployment.
    • Traditional methods often struggle with distinguishing in-distribution (ID) from OOD data.
    • Sharpness-aware Minimization (SAM) shows promise in improving model generalization.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the efficacy of Sharpness-aware Minimization (SAM) for OOD detection.
    • To propose a SAM-based fine-tuning approach to enhance OOD detection performance.
    • To develop a time-efficient fine-tuning strategy using a specialized loss function.

    Main Methods:

    • Fine-tuning machine learning models using Sharpness-aware Minimization (SAM) instead of standard optimizers like SGD.
    • Utilizing a carefully designed loss function to facilitate efficient fine-tuning.
    • Evaluating the method's impact on the separation of in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) data score distributions.

    Main Results:

    • SAM-based fine-tuning significantly improves OOD detection performance.
    • The method effectively pushes score distributions of ID and OOD data further apart.
    • Performance gains are achieved rapidly, often within a single epoch of fine-tuning.
    • The approach demonstrates flexibility, enhancing various existing OOD detection techniques.
    • State-of-the-art results are achieved on standard OOD benchmarks across diverse architectures.

    Conclusions:

    • Sharpness-aware Minimization (SAM) offers a powerful new perspective for improving out-of-distribution (OOD) detection.
    • The proposed SAM-based fine-tuning method is efficient and highly effective.
    • This approach provides a flexible and robust strategy for enhancing the reliability of machine learning models in real-world scenarios.