Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Development of an In Vitro Ocular Platform to Test Contact Lenses
Published on: April 6, 2016
In Vitro Study of Microbial Growth in Artificial Tears Using a Novel Kinetic and Culture-Based Model.
Felipe Echeverri Tribin1, Heather Durkee1, Alexander Alfonso2
1From the Department of Ophthalmology (F.E.T., H.D., A.R.L., M.C.A., S.M., H.W.F., G.A.), Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Preservative-free artificial tears (ATs) significantly increase microbial growth risk compared to preserved ATs. AT formulation is key to contamination susceptibility, highlighting the need for formulation-specific safety evaluations.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Microbiology
- Pharmaceutical Sciences
Background:
- Artificial tears (ATs) are crucial for managing ocular irritation.
- Diverse AT formulations may influence microbial contamination differently.
- Understanding formulation-specific microbial growth is vital for eye safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare microbial growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in various commercial artificial tear formulations.
- To identify formulation-dependent differences in AT susceptibility to microbial contamination.
Main Methods:
- Laboratory investigation involving clinical and reference bacterial isolates (S. aureus, P. aeruginosa).
- Inoculation of bacteria into ten different ATs (preservative-containing multi-dose bottles, preservative-free multi-dose bottles, preservative-free single-dose vials).
- Quantification of microbial growth kinetics (lag time, specific growth rate, area under the curve) over 24 hours.
Main Results:
- Preservative-free ATs supported significantly greater microbial proliferation than preserved formulations (p < 0.001).
- Preservative-free single-dose vials showed the highest microbial growth, especially for P. aeruginosa.
- Preserved ATs exhibited broad-spectrum bactericidal activity, while preservative-free ATs were largely bacteriostatic or permissive to growth.
Conclusions:
- Artificial tear formulation is a primary determinant of microbial proliferation risk.
- Preservative-free formulations present a higher contamination risk.
- Preserved ATs offer antimicrobial protection, necessitating formulation-specific evaluations for AT safety and optimization.
Related Concept Videos
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods
Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods
Microbiome of the Eye

