Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
Published on: August 4, 2023
Quantifying Soft-Surgery in Cochlear Implantation: Multimodal Data From 30 International Specialists
Philipp Aebischer1,2, Georgios Mantokoudis2, Marco Caversaccio1,2
1Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Objective:
To quantify how surgical behavior influences intracochlear mechanical stress during cochlear implantation using objective multi-sensor data from a large cohort of specialist cochlear implant (CI) surgeons.
Methods:
Thirty internationally recognized surgeons each performed bilateral insertions in mechanically representative artificial temporal bone models. Insertion force, pressure, and electrode kinematics were captured, and six trauma-related metrics were combined into a composite soft-surgery score. Associations with surgical experience, self-assessment, and handling behaviors were analysed using nonparametric statistics.
Results:
Marked variability was observed across all metrics. Surgeons with < 50 lifetime insertions performed significantly worse than experienced colleagues. Self-assessment showed no correlation with objective outcomes. Excessively slow insertions and frequent electrode regrasping were associated with higher pressure exposure, greater force variation, and increased intracochlear implant motion. Post-insertion handling contributed substantially to intracochlear stress.
Conclusion:
Surgical behavior decisively influences intracochlear mechanical stress in CI. Steady, uninterrupted advancement at slow to moderate speed, avoidance of array regrasping, and careful post-insertion handling reduce mechanical load. Because self-assessment proved unreliable even among specialist CI surgeons, structured training with quantitative feedback and intraoperative monitoring is essential to refine soft-surgery technique, preserve residual hearing, and optimize hearing outcomes.
Level Of Evidence:
N/A.

