Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bandpass Sampling01:17

Bandpass Sampling

636
In signal processing, bandpass sampling is an effective technique for sampling signals that have most of their energy concentrated within a narrow frequency band. This type of signal is known as a bandpass signal. The key principle of bandpass sampling involves sampling the signal at a rate that is greater than twice the signal's bandwidth to prevent aliasing.
A bandpass signal has a spectrum with a lower frequency limit, denoted as ω1, and an upper frequency limit, denoted as ω2....
636
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation01:09

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

10.7K
The empirical rule, also known as the three-sigma rule, allows a statistician to interpret the standard deviation in a normally distributed dataset. The rule states that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% lies within two standard deviations from the mean, and 99.7% lies within three standard deviations from the mean. Additionally, this rule is also called the 68-95-99.7 rule.
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
10.7K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Sampling Distribution01:12

Sampling Distribution

19.8K
Given simple random samples of size n from a given population with a measured characteristic such as mean, proportion, or standard deviation for each sample, the probability distribution of all the measured characteristics is called a sampling distribution. How much the statistic varies from one sample to another is known as the sampling variability of a statistic. You typically measure the sampling variability of a statistic by its standard error. The standard error of the mean is an example...
19.8K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

15.8K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
15.8K
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

1.3K
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional principal component analysis forsparse censored data.

Biometrika·2026
Same author

Bayesian Transfer Learning.

Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics·2026
Same author

Assessing the utility of the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) as a screening tool among caregivers of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survivors.

Cancer·2026
Same author

A Pilot Study of the Cancer Distress Coach-Caregiver App: A Digital Intervention for Reducing PTSD Symptoms in HCT Caregivers.

Psycho-oncology·2025
Same author

Hidden Population Estimation with Indirect Inference and Auxiliary Information.

Proceedings of machine learning research·2025
Same author

Effectiveness of the smart program: Stepped-care HIV prevention for gay and bisexual adolescent boys.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2025
Same journal

When and Why Hyperbolic Discounting Matters for Reinforcement Learning Interventions.

Reinforcement learning journal·2026
Same journal

Non-Stationary Latent Auto-Regressive Bandits.

Reinforcement learning journal·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K

Empirical Bound Information-Directed Sampling for Norm-Agnostic Bandits.

Piotr M Suder1, Eric Laber1

  • 1Department of Statistical Science, Duke University.

Reinforcement Learning Journal
|April 10, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new frequentist algorithm for bandit problems that automatically learns parameter bounds, reducing regret. This information-directed sampling (IDS) method improves performance without needing prior knowledge of parameter norms.

Keywords:
Bandit algorithmsheteroskedastic noiseinformation-directed samplingparameter bounds

More Related Videos

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.3K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.3K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Reinforcement Learning
  • Optimization

Background:

  • Information-directed sampling (IDS) is effective for bandit problems.
  • Frequentist IDS requires accurate prior bounds on parameter norms for optimal performance.
  • Inaccurate bounds lead to significant regret accumulation in bandit algorithms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel frequentist IDS algorithm that overcomes the need for pre-defined parameter norm bounds.
  • To improve the performance of bandit algorithms in practical scenarios where parameter norms are unknown.
  • To establish theoretical guarantees for the new algorithm's performance.

Main Methods:

  • Introduced a novel frequentist IDS algorithm for the linear bandit setting with heteroskedastic subgaussian noise.
  • Developed a method to iteratively refine high-probability upper bounds on the true parameter norm using accumulating data.
  • Utilized a mixture of information gain criteria to balance bound refinement and optimal action selection.

Main Results:

  • The proposed algorithm achieves regret bounds independent of initial parameter norm assumptions.
  • Demonstrated superior performance compared to existing state-of-the-art IDS and UCB algorithms.
  • The method effectively balances exploration for bound tightening and direct optimization.

Conclusions:

  • The novel IDS algorithm successfully addresses the limitation of requiring prior parameter norm knowledge.
  • This approach offers improved regret performance and practical applicability in bandit problems.
  • The findings advance the field of reinforcement learning and decision-making under uncertainty.