Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: June 25, 2019
Post-matching analysis after coarsened exact matching: implications of coarsening for residual confounding and model
1Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine.
Background:
Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) is a widely used design strategy aimed at reducing confounding in observational studies by matching treated and control units within strata of coarsened covariates. It is often promoted as a method that mimics a randomized block design, which has led many researchers to apply simple, unadjusted statistical methods-such as paired -tests or McNemar's test-originally developed for blocked randomized designs. However, CEM only ensures balance on the coarsened scale, and residual imbalances may remain on the original covariate scale, raising questions about the appropriateness of unadjusted analyses as the primary analytic approach.
Methods:
We examine the implications of this coarsening process for post-matching analysis using literature review, conceptual arguments, and simulation studies. In particular, we evaluate how within-stratum heterogeneity in the original covariates affects residual confounding and the dependence of treatment effect estimates on outcome model specification.
Results:
Our results show that matching on coarsened covariates can leave systematic differences between treated and control subjects within matched strata. These differences introduce residual confounding that does not disappear with increasing sample size. Simulation results further demonstrate a bias-variance trade-off induced by coarsening: fine coarsening may reduce residual confounding but can result in substantial data loss, whereas coarse binning preserves sample size at the cost of increased bias and greater reliance on outcome model specification.
Conclusions:
CEM should be regarded primarily as a preprocessing tool for improving covariate overlap rather than as a stand-alone solution for confounding control. Valid causal inference following CEM generally requires regression adjustment using the original, uncoarsened covariates, and unadjusted analyses of matched data may yield biased treatment effect estimates.
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...

