Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 13, 2026

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Paired with Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction as a Forensic Tool
Published on: May 25, 2021
Comparison of solid phase microextraction coatings for headspace extraction of volatile perfluoroalkyl substances
Madison L Williams1, Aethena Fitzgerald1, David Alonso2
1Department of Chemistry, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14260, United States.
Background:
Volatile and semi-volatile per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) represent an important, yet analytically challenging subset of emerging contaminants. The low atmospheric abundance, high vapor pressures, and susceptibility of these analytes to loss during sample handling necessitate preconcentration strategies capable of capturing these chemically diverse species at trace levels. Solid phase microextraction (SPME) is a solvent-free, equilibrium-based approach well-suited to these challenges, facilitating effective preconcentration while minimizing analyte loss. A key advantage of SPME is the tunability of the sorbent phase chemistry, which enhances extraction efficiency across analytes with diverse physicochemical properties.
Results:
In this work, a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance/polydimethylsiloxane (HLB/PDMS) SPME Arrow sorbent phase was compared with a divinylbenzene/carbon-wide range/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/C-WR/PDMS) SPME Arrow across 15 volatile and semi-volatile PFAS spanning 5 structural classes. The HLB/PDMS phase exhibited higher responses across the suite of PFAS, with 706% and 284% greater peak areas for 4:2 FTOH and 6:2 FTOH, respectively, compared to DVB/C-WR/PDMS. Chromatographic performance was further assessed using both one-dimensional and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS and GC×GC-MS). For the most volatile analytes, improvements in limits of quantification (LOQs) were observed; the LOQ for F-Hexene decreased from 0.05 μg L-1 using 1D GC-MS to 0.005 μg L-1 with GC×GC-MS.
Significance:
This study demonstrates, for the first time, the successful extraction and quantification of volatile PFAS using an HLB/PDMS SPME Arrow. The developed SPME-GC×GC-MS workflow provides a sensitive, solvent-free, and broadly applicable method for trace-level volatile PFAS detection in aqueous, gaseous, and complex solid matrices. These advances establish a versatile platform for comprehensive monitoring of volatile PFAS.
More Related Videos
11:44Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 6, 2016
10:14Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
Published on: September 2, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography: Introduction
In GC, a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a...
Supercritical Fluid Chromatography
SFC utilizes a supercritical fluid mobile phase,...
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
Gas Chromatography: Sample Injection Systems
Two primary injection methods are used...