Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward autonomous robotic-assisted and microrobotic surgery.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Fluorescence-Guided Surgery of Rhabdomyosarcoma Using a B7-H3 Targeted Antibody-Fluorophore Conjugate.

Molecular pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

Preoperative Nutritional Laboratory Tests Are Infrequently Obtained and Weakly Associated With 90-Day Reoperation Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Review of Cherenkov imaging technology advances in radiotherapy: single-photon-level imaging in high ambient light and radiation backgrounds.

Biophotonics discovery·2026
Same author

Systematic tissue oxygen variation shows the modulation of murine skin radiation toxicity at ultra-high dose rates.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Implementation of a Prospective, Multi-Center Clinical Study of Dynamic Contrast Fluorescence Imaging to Diagnose Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infection - Challenges and Lessons Learned.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2026
Same journal

Homogeneity of Liver Fat Distribution Serves as a Diagnostic Marker for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

MRI-based Predictors and Risk Constellations of Chronic Ankle Instability After Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain: A Multicenter Study.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Early Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer using a Longitudinal US-based Stack-model.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the Impact of Embolization on Outcomes in Iliopsoas Hematomas: A Multicenter Retrospective Propensity-matched Study.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Presets In Ultra-high-resolution Photon-counting CT Angiography of Patients with Total Knee Endoprosthesis.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Deep Learning for Opportunistic Vertebral Fracture Detection on Routine Thoraco-abdominal Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Meta-analysis of Patient-level Diagnostic Test Accuracy.

Academic radiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.9K

Phantom Calibration's Impact on Measuring Radiodensity Changes: Implications for Evaluating Osteosarcoma Response.

Michael A McNamara1, Patrick M Mazza1, Kendra A Hebert2

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, New Hampshire (M.A.M., P.M.M., K.A.H. P.M.W., E.R.H.).

Academic Radiology
|April 12, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Image calibration with an aluminum step phantom did not improve radiodensity measurement accuracy in this cadaveric study. High-quality digital radiographs without calibration yielded more accurate results for evaluating simulated tumors.

Keywords:
CadaverChemotherapyOrthopedic OncologyOsteosarcomaPhantom

More Related Videos

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

11.8K
Modeling Primary Bone Tumors and Bone Metastasis with Solid Tumor Graft Implantation into Bone
06:53

Modeling Primary Bone Tumors and Bone Metastasis with Solid Tumor Graft Implantation into Bone

Published on: September 9, 2020

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.9K
Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

11.8K
Modeling Primary Bone Tumors and Bone Metastasis with Solid Tumor Graft Implantation into Bone
06:53

Modeling Primary Bone Tumors and Bone Metastasis with Solid Tumor Graft Implantation into Bone

Published on: September 9, 2020

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Orthopedic Oncology

Background:

  • Accurate radiodensity measurements are crucial for evaluating tumor response to chemotherapy before surgical resection.
  • Current methods may lack precision, necessitating controlled studies to optimize imaging techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether image calibration using an aluminum step phantom improves radiodensity measurement accuracy compared to uncalibrated digital radiographs.
  • To enhance the evaluation of osteosarcoma response to chemotherapy prior to resection.

Main Methods:

  • A controlled cadaveric study using five fresh-frozen lower extremities.
  • Computed tomography (CT) and digital radiography (anteroposterior and lateral views) were performed.
  • Simulated tumors of varying radiodensities and a calibration phantom were used; grayscale measurements and accuracy comparisons were conducted.

Main Results:

  • Uncalibrated digital radiographs (Cohort 1) demonstrated significantly higher accuracy (.12 ± 0.11) than calibrated radiographs (Cohorts 2-4) (.39 ± 0.54-0.60) (p < 0.001).
  • Specific imaging settings (e.g., 4 mAs-70 kVp) and variations in bone density/BMI improved accuracy (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

  • Image calibration with an aluminum step phantom worsened radiodensity measurement accuracy in this specific setting, likely due to introduced error.
  • High-quality digital radiographs with consistent settings may not require phantom calibration for improved accuracy.
  • Further research is needed to assess calibration's utility with variable imaging techniques.