Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Controlled Cortical Impact Model for Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: August 5, 2014
Primary and Secondary Decompressive Craniectomy in Traumatic Brain Injury: Indications and Timing.
David J Caldwell1, Maxwell B Wang1, Michael E Baumgartner1
1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Avenue, 8th Floor, San Francisco, CA, USA; Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Secondary decompressive craniectomy improves outcomes for traumatic intracranial hematomas, especially after 72 hours. Static pressure thresholds are insufficient for guiding neurosurgical decisions in neurotrauma.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Trauma Care
- Neurology
Background:
- Primary evacuation of traumatic intracranial hematomas is established.
- Secondary decompressive craniectomy shows improved outcomes for refractory intracranial pressure beyond 72 hours postinjury.
- The efficacy of secondary decompression within 24–72 hours remains uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the optimal timing and criteria for secondary decompressive craniectomy in traumatic intracranial hematomas.
- To highlight the limitations of static intracranial pressure thresholds in neurosurgical decision-making.
- To propose an integrated approach for optimizing clinical decisions and outcomes in neurotrauma.
Main Methods:
- Literature review on primary evacuation and secondary decompressive craniectomy.
- Analysis of outcomes based on timing of decompression (within 24–72 hours vs. beyond 72 hours).
- Discussion on the inadequacy of static intracranial pressure thresholds.
Main Results:
- Secondary decompressive craniectomy after 72 hours significantly improves mortality and functional outcomes.
- Benefits of decompression within 24–72 hours are less clear.
- Static intracranial pressure thresholds alone are unsuitable for neurosurgical decision-making.
Conclusions:
- Timing is crucial for the effectiveness of secondary decompressive craniectomy.
- Future research should integrate diverse predictors for improved neurotrauma management.
- Optimizing clinical decision-making requires a multimodal approach beyond static pressure monitoring.
Related Concept Videos
Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction
Spinal Cord Injury ll: Pathophysiology
Secondary Spinal Cord Injury llI: Pathophysiology

