Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Molecular Orbital Theory I

Molecular Orbital Theory I

Overview of Molecular Orbital Theory

Molecular Orbital Theory II

Molecular Orbital Theory II

Molecular Orbital Energy Diagrams

Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I

Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I

The mathematical expression known as the wave function, ψ, contains information about each orbital and the wavelike properties of electrons in an isolated atom. When atoms are bound together in a molecule, the wave functions combine to produce new mathematical descriptions that have different shapes. This process of combining the wave functions for atomic orbitals is called hybridization and is mathematically accomplished by the linear combination of atomic orbitals. The new orbitals that...

Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II

Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II

sp3d and sp3d 2 Hybridization

MO Theory and Covalent Bonding

MO Theory and Covalent Bonding

The molecular orbital theory describes the distribution of electrons in molecules in a manner similar to the distribution of electrons in atomic orbitals. The region of space in which a valence electron in a molecule is likely to be found is called a molecular orbital. Mathematically, the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) generates molecular orbitals. Combinations of in-phase atomic orbital wave functions result in regions with a high probability of electron density, while...

Valence Bond Theory and Hybridized Orbitals

Valence Bond Theory and Hybridized Orbitals

According to valence bond theory, a covalent bond results when: (1) an orbital on one atom overlaps an orbital on a second atom, and (2) the single electrons in each orbital combine to form an electron pair. The strength of a covalent bond depends on the extent of overlap of the orbitals involved. Maximum overlap is possible when the orbitals overlap on a direct line between the two nuclei.
A σ bond (single bond in a Lewis structure) is a covalent bond in which the electron density is...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Personal recollections of a quantum chemist.

Chemical science·2025

Same author

Thermodynamics of Intrinsic Reaction Coordinate (IRC) Chemical Reaction Pathways.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Same author

Towards a complete description of the reaction mechanisms between nitrenium ions and water.

Journal of molecular modeling·2024

Same author

Natural resonance-theoretic conceptions of extreme electronic delocalization in soft materials.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2024

Same author

"Noncovalent Interaction": A Chemical Misnomer That Inhibits Proper Understanding of Hydrogen Bonding, Rotation Barriers, and Other Topics.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2023

Same author

High-Density "Windowpane" Coordination Patterns of Water Clusters and Their NBO/NRT Characterization.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Probe Type II Band Alignment in One-Dimensional Van Der Waals Heterostructures Using First-Principles Calculations

Probe Type II Band Alignment in One-Dimensional Van Der Waals Heterostructures Using First-Principles Calculations

Published on: October 12, 2019

Inconsistencies of Gaussian's "NBO 3.1" Module With Authentic Natural Population Analysis.

Frank Weinhold¹

¹Theoretical Chemistry Institute and Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Journal of Computational Chemistry

|April 13, 2026

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study highlights significant differences in Natural Bond Orbital (NBO) analysis results between Gaussian-16's NBO 3.1 module and the official NBO7 program. These discrepancies impact computational chemistry research findings.

Keywords:

Gaussian 16 “NBO 3.1” module atomic charge discrepant “NBO analysis”heavy‐atom metallicity natural population analysis (NPA)

More Related Videos

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Probe Type II Band Alignment in One-Dimensional Van Der Waals Heterostructures Using First-Principles Calculations

Probe Type II Band Alignment in One-Dimensional Van Der Waals Heterostructures Using First-Principles Calculations

Published on: October 12, 2019

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Computational Chemistry
Quantum Chemistry

Background:

Natural Bond Orbital (NBO) analysis is a key method for understanding electronic structure.
Accurate NBO analysis is crucial for interpreting chemical bonding and reactivity.
Discrepancies in NBO calculation methods can lead to misinterpretations.

Purpose of the Study:

To illustrate discrepancies between Gaussian-16's NBO 3.1 and the authentic NBO7 program.
To highlight potential issues in computational chemistry research due to software variations.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of NBO results.
Utilizing Gaussian-16's NBO 3.1 module.
Utilizing the NBO7 program.

Main Results:

Identified significant discrepancies in NBO analysis outcomes.
Demonstrated variations in electronic structure interpretations based on the NBO tool used.

Conclusions:

Gaussian-16's NBO 3.1 module may yield different results compared to the official NBO7 program.
Researchers should be aware of these differences when interpreting computational chemistry data.