Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
Phase II Trials in Radiation Oncology: When Success Fails to Translate
Nina N Sanford1, David J Sher1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Purpose:
Phase II trials are intended to identify promising treatment paradigms for definitive phase III testing, but how effectively they serve this role in radiation oncology is unknown. We evaluated whether phase II cooperative group studies of radiation therapy function as effective gateways to phase III testing and identified factors associated with downstream progression.
Methods:
Using ClinicalTrials.gov, we identified completed phase II radiation therapy trials conducted through the National Clinical Trials Network cooperative groups. We assessed whether trials met their prespecified primary end point and whether successful trials progressed to phase III evaluation. Logistic regression evaluated associations between trial characteristics and phase III transition. Decision concordance between phase II outcomes and subsequent development decisions was examined.
Results:
Among 92 completed phase II trials (2003-2019), 54% met their primary end point, yet only 17% progressed to phase III testing. Among trials that met their end point, fewer than one third advanced, with 71% representing discordant successes (positive phase II trial without phase III progression). Toxicity-based end points most frequently met phase II criteria (67%) but were least likely to translate to phase III (8% of successful trials). Larger enrollment number (odds ratio [OR], 1.68 per 50 patients [95% CI, 1.21 to 2.31]) and longer duration (OR, 1.20 per year [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.44]) were associated with phase III transition. Trials that advanced to phase III were not completed more rapidly (median duration 132 v 108 months).
Conclusion:
Most phase II radiation oncology trials that meet prespecified end points do not progress to definitive phase III testing. This phenomenon appears driven less by statistical futility than by structural and decisional barriers. Greater prespecification of advancement intent and selection of decision-relevant end points may improve the efficiency and impact of radiotherapy cooperative group trials.
More Related Videos
08:34Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...