Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correspondence on: Antidepressants and postoperative complications in breast reduction surgery: A propensity score-matched multicenter analysis.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same author

Implications of a New Generation of Tissue Expanders for Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy in Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Preoperative nutritional resilience in the era of GLP-1 therapy: implications for body contouring surgery.

Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery·2026
Same author

Comparative Study of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Autologous Fat Grafting Versus Implant-Based Augmentation in Tuberous Breast Deformity.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
Same author

A Comparative Multimodal Approach to Post-Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation After Energy-Assisted Liposuction: Laser Therapy With or Without Hyperbaric Oxygen.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2026
Same author

Hepatitis B Virus, Pneumococcal, Diphtheria, and Tetanus Vaccination Responses in Compensated Cirrhosis.

Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver·2026
Same journal

Early Protein Supplementation Enhances Wound Healing and Reduces Complications Following Abdominoplasty: A Controlled Study in Non-bariatric Patients.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Otoplasty in the Scientific Literature: Global Productivity, Thematic Evolution, and Forecasted Trajectories.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Mycobacterium Abscessus Infection after Breast Augmentation: Case Reports and Literature Review.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

COVID-19-Related Immune Activation and Capsular Contracture: A Cohort Study of Infection, Vaccination, and Explantation.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Do Native Breasts Move During Pectoralis Major Contraction in Unoperated Women? A Quantitative 3D Analysis.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

From Bench to Operating Room: The Scientific Mind in Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.9K

Machine Learning to Predict Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Failure: A Bootstrap-Validated Elastic Net Model.

Yanis Berkane1,2, Anna Scarabosio3, Glenda G Caputo3

  • 1Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHU de Rennes, University of Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France. yanis.berkane@chu-rennes.fr.

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
|April 13, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new predictive model helps estimate implant loss risk after breast reconstruction. This tool aids surgeons in preoperative counseling and decision-making for better patient outcomes.

Keywords:
Breast implantBreast reconstructionImmediate reconstructionMultivariate analysisPredictive scoreRadiationReconstruction failure

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.7K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

872

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.9K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.7K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

872

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Breast Reconstruction
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) failure is a significant complication.
  • Lack of reliable preoperative risk prediction tools impacts patient outcomes.
  • Predicting IBR failure is crucial for surgical planning and patient counseling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a predictive model for implant loss after breast reconstruction.
  • To identify key predictors of implant-based reconstruction failure.
  • To provide a clinical tool for real-time risk assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of 381 IBR procedures (2006-2023).
  • Elastic net regression developed a multivariable model.
  • Internal bootstrap validation followed TRIPOD+AI guidelines.
  • Model performance assessed using AUC, calibration, and decision curve analysis.

Main Results:

  • The implant-based reconstruction failure rate was 5.5%.
  • Key predictors included postoperative radiotherapy, expander use, and age-BMI interaction.
  • Optimism-corrected AUC was 0.856, indicating strong discrimination.
  • The model demonstrated good calibration and clinical utility, available online.

Conclusions:

  • A robust, internally validated predictive model for implant loss post-IBR was developed.
  • An online calculator offers real-time, individualized risk estimation.
  • The tool supports preoperative counseling and surgical decision-making.
  • Further external validation and implementation studies are recommended.