Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Role of FAM83A in Cervical Cancer
Published on: February 9, 2024
Physician-Level Determinants of Cervical Cancer Screening Practices: A Socio-Ecological Model-Based Study from
Koba Kamashidze1, Tina Beruchashvili1, Tamar Peshkova2
1School of Health Sciences, University of Georgia, 0171 Tbilisi, Georgia.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Cervical cancer is widely recognized as a preventable disease; however, participation in screening programs remains insufficient in many transitional health systems. In the Georgia, organized screening services are available, yet utilisation remains low, indicating barriers to screening extend beyond access alone. This study, therefore, examined physician-level factors influencing the promotion of cervical cancer screening in the Adjara region of Georgia, with focus on routine clinical practice and organizational conditions. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out among physicians providing outpatient and preventive services in six municipalities of the Adjara region. The analysis was guided by a socio-ecological framework and examined individual, inter-personal, and organizational factors in relation to physicians' recent cervical cancer screening recommendation practices. Multivariable logistic and ordinal regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with screening promotion. Results: Despite a generally high level of support for cervical cancer screening among physicians, regular screening recommendations were not consistently reported. Limited consultation time, uncertainty regarding screening-related harms, and rural practice settings were independently associated with a lower probability of having recently recommended screening. In contrast, favourable attitudes toward screening on their own were not sufficient to translate into routine preventive practice. Conclusions: These findings indicate that gaps between physician attitudes and screening promotion are largely driven by structural and organizational factors rather than a lack of professional support. Efforts to reduce workflow constraints, improve clarity around screening guidance, and integrate preventive counselling into routine clinical practice may be essential for improving screening uptake in similar healthcare system contexts.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Principles of Disease Surveillance