Application of Electric-Field-Optimized Augmented Reality-Guided Neuronavigation in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Background: Navigated repetitive TMS (nrTMS) is widely used for non-invasive mapping of cortical functions. Methodological improvement might be achieved by optimizing coil positioning based on electric-field modeling and augmented reality (AR)-guided neuronavigation to enhance spatial targeting accuracy and stimulation-induced language errors. Therefore, we compared electric-field-optimized, AR-guided nrTMS with conventional nrTMS using manually planned coil positioning. Methods: Twenty-eight healthy subjects underwent two MRI-guided left hemispheric nrTMS language mapping sessions. Each session used 10 Hz stimulation at a 100% resting motor threshold applied for 1.5 s per region of interest (ROI) during a synchronized object naming task. ROIs were defined according to the Corina cortical parcellation system. Manually defined and electric-field-optimized coil placements obtained using SimNIBS (v4.1.0) were applied; the optimized session was assisted by AR goggles. The primary outcome was the quantitative and categorical differences in cortical regions mapped as language-eloquent. Resting-state fMRI was acquired to provide a reference for comparing nrTMS-derived language maps. Outcomes: Electric-field-optimized nrTMS did not result in an increase in positively mapped ROIs. A different distribution of language errors was observed between sessions. Manual mapping roughly followed the extracted resting-state language and motor networks, whereas electric-field-optimized mapping might correspond less. Optimized coil positions were not always practically feasible. AR guidance improved target location accuracy. Conclusions: While AR was a useful addition to the TMS experiment, electric-field optimization did not translate into significant behavioral differences. However, altered distribution of language errors can give insight into underlying neurophysiological processes of rTMS.