Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Preparation of Samples for Electron Microscopy01:20

Preparation of Samples for Electron Microscopy

8.0K
To be visualized by an electron microscope, either transmission or scanning, biological samples need to be fixed (stabilized) so the electron beam does not destroy them and dried thoroughly (desiccated/dehydrated) so the vacuum does not affect them. Fixation needs to be done as quickly as possible because the sample properties will start changing as soon as it is removed from its natural environment. For example, in a tissue sample, the oxygen levels begin decreasing, causing an altered...
8.0K
X-ray Diffraction of Biological Samples01:10

X-ray Diffraction of Biological Samples

5.2K
X-ray diffraction or XRD is an analytical tool that utilizes X-rays to study ordered structures such as crystalline organic and inorganic samples, polycrystalline materials, proteins, carbohydrates, and drugs.
According to Bragg's law, when X-rays strike the sample positioned on a stage, the rays are  scattered by the electron clouds around the sample atoms. The  X-ray diffraction or scattering is caused by constructive interference of the X-ray waves that reflect off the internal...
5.2K
Scanning Electron Microscopy01:07

Scanning Electron Microscopy

6.1K
A scanning electron microscope (SEM) is used to study the surface features of a sample by using an electron beam that scans the sample surface in a two-dimensional manner. Typically, areas between ~1 centimeter to 5 micrometers in width can be imaged. SEM can be used to image bacteria, viruses, tissues as well as larger samples like insects. Conventional SEM gives a magnification ranging from 20X to 30,000X and spatial resolution of 50 to 100 nanometers.
Fundamental Principles
Accelerated...
6.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Combination of 3D and 2D Small and Wide Angle X-Ray Scattering Imaging Reveals Diminished Bone Quality in the Superior Human Femoral Neck Cortex.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026
Same author

Three-Dimensional Characterization of the Collagen-Hydroxyapatite Interaction During Heterotopic Ossification in Healing Rat Achilles Tendons.

Small science·2026
Same author

Dynamic sampling for SAXSTT: towards real-time measurement adaptation.

Journal of synchrotron radiation·2026
Same author

Computational corrections for anisotropic absorption in tensor tomography.

Journal of synchrotron radiation·2025
Same author

<i>MUMOTT</i>: a Python package for the analysis of multi-modal tensor tomography data.

Journal of applied crystallography·2025
Same author

Texture tomography with high angular resolution utilizing sparsity.

Journal of applied crystallography·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Structural Studies of Macromolecules in Solution using Small Angle X-Ray Scattering
07:19

Structural Studies of Macromolecules in Solution using Small Angle X-Ray Scattering

Published on: November 5, 2018

13.6K

Effect of soft tissue sample preparation techniques for scanning small-angle X-ray scattering experiments.

Atreyee Acharya1, Arthur Baroni1, Irene Rodriguez-Fernandez1

  • 1Center for Photon Science, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland.

Journal of Synchrotron Radiation
|April 14, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Scanning small-angle X-ray scattering (sSAXS) studies tissue nanostructure. Tissue processing alters sSAXS signals, necessitating careful method selection for accurate results.

Keywords:
collagen structureembeddingfixationmuscle structuresmall-angle X-ray scattering

More Related Videos

3D Imaging of Soft-Tissue Samples using an X-ray Specific Staining Method and Nanoscopic Computed Tomography
07:01

3D Imaging of Soft-Tissue Samples using an X-ray Specific Staining Method and Nanoscopic Computed Tomography

Published on: October 24, 2019

10.4K
A 3D Cartographic Description of the Cell by Cryo Soft X-ray Tomography
08:47

A 3D Cartographic Description of the Cell by Cryo Soft X-ray Tomography

Published on: March 15, 2021

4.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Structural Studies of Macromolecules in Solution using Small Angle X-Ray Scattering
07:19

Structural Studies of Macromolecules in Solution using Small Angle X-Ray Scattering

Published on: November 5, 2018

13.6K
3D Imaging of Soft-Tissue Samples using an X-ray Specific Staining Method and Nanoscopic Computed Tomography
07:01

3D Imaging of Soft-Tissue Samples using an X-ray Specific Staining Method and Nanoscopic Computed Tomography

Published on: October 24, 2019

10.4K
A 3D Cartographic Description of the Cell by Cryo Soft X-ray Tomography
08:47

A 3D Cartographic Description of the Cell by Cryo Soft X-ray Tomography

Published on: March 15, 2021

4.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biophysics
  • Materials Science
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Scanning small-angle X-ray scattering (sSAXS) is vital for analyzing soft tissue nanostructure.
  • Fresh tissues are fragile, complicating sectioning and leading to data loss.
  • Standard tissue processing can introduce artifacts, hindering accurate sSAXS interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify structural changes in skeletal muscle tissue caused by common preservation methods.
  • To assess the impact of fixation and embedding on sSAXS data.
  • To guide the selection of appropriate tissue preservation techniques for sSAXS analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized scanning small-angle X-ray scattering (sSAXS) on skeletal muscle tissue.
  • Compared sSAXS data from fresh tissue versus tissue processed with various fixation and embedding methods.
  • Analyzed structural alterations in both muscle fibers and connective tissue.

Main Results:

  • All tested tissue processing methods induced measurable structural changes in the sSAXS signal.
  • The degree of structural alteration varied depending on the preservation technique used.
  • Some methods preserved tissue nanostructure better than others, but none were artifact-free.

Conclusions:

  • Tissue processing significantly impacts sSAXS data, introducing structural modifications.
  • The optimal preservation method depends on balancing sectioning needs with the desired structural information.
  • Informed selection of preservation techniques is crucial for reliable sSAXS studies of soft tissues.