Post-PCI Global QFR and Long-Term Outcomes in ACS: Findings From the FAVOR III China Trial
Xiaohua Shen1, Han Zhang2, Zhengwei Li1
1Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Background:
The prognostic utility of residual pressure wire-based physiological assessment after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been demonstrated.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the residual global Murray law-based angiographic quantitative flow ratio (μQFR) in an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population.
Methods:
In this post hoc analysis from the FAVOR III China (Comparison of Quantitative Flow Ratio Guided and Angiography Guided Percutaneous Intervention in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease) trial, off-line μQFR was computed for 3 major coronary arteries. Residual global μQFR was calculated as the sum of postprocedural μQFR values for treated vessels and preprocedural values for nontreated vessels. ACS patients (including those with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and unstable angina) were categorized into high-risk (less than or equal to the cutoff value) and low-risk (greater than the cutoff value) groups according to residual global μQFR. The primary endpoint was 3-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE), the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization.
Results:
Among 2,428 ACS patients, 2,241 (92.3%) had analyzable μQFR, with a cutoff value of 2.71. High-risk patients (n = 407 [18.2%]) had a greater incidence of 3-year MACE (21.2% vs 10.4%; adjusted HR [aHR]: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.10-2.13; P = 0.01) and MACE excluding periprocedural myocardial infarction (16.2% vs 7.8%; aHR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.17-2.53; P = 0.006) compared with the low-risk group. The prognostic effect of residual global μQFR was consistent across QFR- and angiography-guided subgroups (P for interaction = 0.35). Patients with low residual ischemia derived the best outcomes after QFR-guided PCI (MACE 8.8% vs 11.9% for angiography-guided PCI; HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.55-0.97).
Conclusions:
Residual global μQFR is a robust angiographic index for post-PCI ischemia burden and long-term risk stratification. In patients with ACS, QFR-guided PCI achieving low residual global ischemia was associated with the most favorable 3-year prognosis.
More Related Videos
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
05:07Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
