Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
Published on: September 26, 2025
Neurodivergent influenceability in agentic AI as a contingent solution to the AI alignment problem
Alberto Hernández-Espinosa1,2, Felipe S Abrahão1,2, Olaf Witkowski2,3,4
1Oxford Immune Algorithmics, Oxford University Innovation, London Institute for Healthcare Engineering, London, United Kingdom.
AI alignment is challenging. This study proves misalignment is inevitable, proposing neurodivergent influenceability in AI agents to foster a safe, diverse ecosystem rather than seeking full control.
Area of Science:
- Artificial Intelligence Safety
- AI Alignment
- Machine Learning Ethics
Background:
- The AI alignment problem concerns ensuring advanced AI systems, including artificial general intelligence (AGI) and artificial superintelligence (ASI), align with human values.
- Increasing AI capabilities raise concerns about control and potential existential risks.
- Current approaches struggle with the inherent complexity of aligning autonomous AI agents.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce novel concepts: agentic influenceability, behavioral neurodivergent diversity, opinion attack, associated opinion, and influenceability scores.
- To provide a mathematical proof for the inevitability of AI misalignment and the impossibility of full orchestrated controllability.
- To explore embracing inevitable misalignment for a dynamic ecosystem of adversarial and collaborative AI agents with soft controllability.
Main Methods:
- Formal undecidability and irreducibility arguments to prove the inevitability of misalignment and impossibility of full control.
- Mathematical modeling of agentic influenceability and behavioral diversity.
- Experimental analysis comparing open and proprietary large language models (LLMs).
Main Results:
- Demonstrated that misalignment in foundation models can act as a counterbalancing mechanism, fostering cooperation among aligned agents.
- Open LLMs exhibit greater behavioral diversity compared to proprietary models, which show limited controllability due to artificial guardrails.
- Mathematical proof confirms the inevitability of misalignment and the impossibility of complete orchestrated controllability for agentic systems.
Conclusions:
- Embracing inevitable AI misalignment can lead to a more robust and safer AI ecosystem through adversarial and collaborative dynamics.
- Neurodivergent influenceability is proposed as a pragmatic response to uncontrollable AI misalignment, leveraging agent divergence for enhanced AI safety.
- Findings suggest that open AI models may offer a pathway towards greater AI safety through inherent diversity.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Non-equilibrium in the Cell
Implicit Personality Theories
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

