Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Systems Analysis of the Neuroinflammatory and Hemodynamic Response to Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: May 27, 2022
Artificial Intelligence in Trauma Care: A Systematic Review of Resuscitation, Diagnosis, Risk Prediction, and
Sukriti Prashar1, Youssef Nasef, Alexander Brown
1Author Affiliations: NOVA Southeastern University, Kiran Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, Florida (Prashar); Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (Nasef); NOVA Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida (Brown); John A Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii (Nishida); William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, Mississippi (Rogers); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida (Bundschu); Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana (Zagales); Florida State University School of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida (Kata); Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, Florida (Elkbuli); and Department of Surgical Education, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, Florida (Elkbuli).
Background:
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being explored in trauma care as a tool to support clinical decision-making.
Objective:
To evaluate current evidence on AI applications in trauma resuscitation, diagnosis, complication prediction, and patient management.
Methods:
A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane databases to identify studies published between 2015 and 2025. After screening 2968 records, 58 studies met inclusion criteria and were analyzed using a narrative synthesis approach.
Results:
AI models were applied to trauma resuscitation (n = 8), diagnosis (n = 18), complication prediction (n = 23), and patient management (n = 9). Machine learning and deep learning approaches demonstrated performance comparable with, or exceeding, traditional clinical tools in some studies, including tasks such as predicting massive transfusion, detecting intracranial hemorrhage, forecasting mortality, and supporting intensive care unit or discharge planning. Interpretation of these findings is limited by the predominance of single-center, retrospective study designs and the frequent absence of external validation.
Conclusions:
AI shows meaningful potential to support clinical decision-making across multiple stages of trauma care, particularly in time-sensitive, high-risk settings. At present, the evidence base primarily reflects early-phase model development rather than clinical implementation. Future research should prioritize prospective, multicenter studies with external validation and evaluation of real-world clinical impact to determine whether AI-assisted decision support can improve patient-centered outcomes and safely integrate into trauma care workflows.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques