Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating incidence and mortality trends of early-onset colorectal cancer and adenoma in Belgium.

ESMO gastrointestinal oncology·2026
Same author

Validation and performance of a geriatric early warning score (GEWS) versus the national early warning score (NEWS) in predicting clinical deterioration in frail older patients.

European geriatric medicine·2025
Same author

Decreased incidence and shift in stage distribution for colorectal cancers in Belgium during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica·2025
Same author

Expression patterns of H3K27me3 for differentiation of breast fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumors.

APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica·2024
Same author

Effect of a single small volume fluid bolus with balanced or un-balanced fluids on chloride and acid-base status: a prospective randomized pilot study (the FLURES-trial).

Journal of nephrology·2024
Same author

Progestin primed ovarian stimulation using dydrogesterone from day 7 of the cycle onwards in oocyte donation cycles: a longitudinal study.

Reproductive biomedicine online·2024
Same journal

Assessing key aspects of equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) among undergraduate radiography students at an Irish university.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2026
Same journal

Magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) and clinical outcomes: A systematic review.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2026
Same journal

Taking the mobile to the patient's home: A systematic review of domiciliary x-ray imaging.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2026
Same journal

Radiographers' perceptions of malpractice and radiographic errors in the United Arab Emirates.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2026
Same journal

Contrast injection protocols used in oncological CT and opportunities for practice optimisation.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2026
Same journal

Peer-assisted learning in medical radiation sciences education and training: A scoping review.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

420

Image quality standards in digital mammography: A consensus statement.

L Vandendaele1, P J De Visschere2, S Hendrickx2

  • 1Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 5K3, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)
|April 17, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study developed a standardized mammogram quality checklist to reduce observer variability in screening programs. The tool ensures consistent interpretation of mammographic images for improved patient care.

Keywords:
Delphi methodDigital mammographyImage qualityScreeningStandards

More Related Videos

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.9K
Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

11.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

420
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.9K
Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

11.8K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Quality Assurance

Background:

  • Mammogram image quality assessment faces challenges due to inter- and intra-observer variability.
  • This inconsistency impacts the reliability of quality assessments in screening programs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish a standardized framework for describing mammogram image quality.
  • The goal is to reduce subjectivity and enhance observer consistency in quality assessments.

Main Methods:

  • A scoping literature review identified 19 initial image quality criteria.
  • A modified Delphi survey with 23 multidisciplinary experts refined these criteria.
  • Consensus was reached through expert ranking and focus group discussions.

Main Results:

  • Consensus was achieved on criteria including image identification, artifacts, uniformity, symmetry, contrast, radiation dose, and depiction of specific breast regions.
  • Areas requiring further guidelines include additional/alternative images, compression force descriptions, and retake criteria for folds/air projections.

Conclusions:

  • A checklist for mammogram image quality assessment was developed.
  • The study provides cut-off values for good, suboptimal, and insufficient quality.
  • A standardized tool is offered to improve mammographic image quality interpretation consistency in screening.