Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
Published on: February 16, 2024
Development and validation of a novel blood-based biomarker for gastric cancer triage in chronic dyspepsia
Minji Seo1, Ka Man Cheung2, Serene J L Lam3
1Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Insights
Routine blood tests, enhanced by machine learning into the RBT-GC biomarker, can effectively stratify gastric cancer risk. This approach significantly reduces the need for invasive scoping, optimizing endoscopy resource allocation for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Biomarkers
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Gastric cancer (GC) screening via endoscopy faces challenges due to high number-needed-to-scope (NNS).
- Routine blood tests (RBT) have limited direct utility for GC screening.
- Machine learning offers potential for repurposing RBT data for risk stratification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a machine-learning-integrated biomarker (RBT-GC) for opportunistic gastric cancer risk stratification.
- To optimize endoscopy resource allocation by identifying high-risk individuals.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 20 years of retrospective data (2000-2020) from the Hong Kong Hospital Authority.
- Training a machine learning model using 24 RBT and demographic features from 210,463 subjects (2000-2015).
- Validation of the RBT-GC model on an independent cohort of 90,479 subjects (2016-2020).
Main Results:
- The RBT-GC model stratified the validation cohort into low-risk (0.3% GC prevalence), intermediate-risk (1.9%), and high-risk (14.0%) categories.
- The model detected 12x more GC cases than CEA and 30x more than CA19.9.
- Opportunistic RBT-GC risk stratification reduced the NNS from 44 to 7 in the high-risk group.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning can repurpose standard blood tests into an effective triage tool for gastric cancer screening.
- The RBT-GC biomarker offers an affordable, scalable solution to alleviate endoscopic burdens.
- Optimized endoscopy resource allocation through RBT-GC can improve gastric cancer detection rates.
Abstract:
Global implementation of gastric cancer (GC) screening in chronic dyspepsia populations faces challenges due to the high number-needed-to-scope (NNS) for oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. Routine blood tests (RBT) have limited utility for GC screening but offer potential for risk stratification when repurposed through machine learning. This study develops and validates a machine-learning-integrated biomarker (RBT-GC) that uses opportunistic triage to optimise endoscopy resource allocation. The team analysed 20 years of territory-wide retrospective data (2000-2020) from the Hong Kong Hospital Authority. 24 RBT and demographic features from 210,463 subjects (3071 cases) between 2000 and 2015 were used in training. An independent cohort of 90,479 subjects (2066 cases) from 2016 to 2020 was used in validation. The RBT-GC model successfully stratified validation cohort (2.3% baseline GC prevalence) into low-risk (0.3% prevalence), intermediate-risk (1.9%) and high-risk (14.0%) categories. The model detected (1276 cases) 12x more than CEA (102 cases) and 30x more than CA19.9 (42 cases). The application of opportunistic RBT-GC risk stratification reduced the NNS from 44 to 7 in the high-risk category of validation cohort. This machine learning approach repurposed standard blood tests into an opportunistic, affordable, scalable triage tool to alleviate endoscopic burdens across healthcare systems.
Related Concept Videos
Gastritis III: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical manifestations of acute gastritis
The patient with acute gastritis may have a rapid onset of symptoms, such as epigastric pain or discomfort, dyspepsia, anorexia, hiccups, or nausea and vomiting, which can last from a few hours to a few days. Erosive or hemorrhagic gastritis may cause bleeding, which may manifest as blood in vomit or as...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
What is Monogastric Digestion?
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...

