Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy DISE with Target Controlled Infusion TCI and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
Difference-making factors in implementing a quality improvement program for sleep apnea in stroke/TIA patients
Nicholas A Rattray1,2,3,4, Edward J Miech5,6,7, Dawn M Bravata5,6,8,7,9,10
1Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Systems Research (HSR) Expanding Expertise Through E-health Network Development (EXTEND) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), Indianapolis, IN, USA. Nicholas.rattray@va.gov.
Implementing a quality improvement intervention for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in stroke patients was successful at four of six sites. Key factors included sleep testing processes, care coordination, and champion support for better OSA management.
Area of Science:
- Quality Improvement in Healthcare
- Sleep Medicine and Neurology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent, underdiagnosed risk factor in ~70% of stroke/TIA patients, linked to poor recovery and increased mortality.
- Despite guidelines, early OSA screening post-stroke/TIA is infrequent, hindering effective risk factor management and prevention of recurrent events.
- This study addresses the implementation of a quality improvement intervention for OSA management within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the implementation of a multidisciplinary quality improvement intervention for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) management in stroke and TIA patients.
- To identify contextual factors influencing the success of implementing an acute sleep service across six VA medical centers.
- To determine conditions associated with successful OSA diagnosis and treatment adoption in post-stroke/TIA populations.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the Addressing Sleep Apnea Post-Stroke/TIA (ASAP) stepped-wedge cluster-randomized clinical trial (NCT04322162).
- Employed mixed-methods, including qualitative provider interviews and quantitative configurational comparative methods (CCMs).
- Assessed implementation success using the Group Organization (GO) score, measuring team cohesion and activation in OSA care.
Main Results:
- Successful implementation (GO score ≥ 6) was achieved at four out of six participating VA medical centers.
- Four specific conditions were identified as sufficient for implementation success: sleep test ordering, process monitoring, post-discharge care coordination, and champion influence.
- These factors significantly distinguished between sites that successfully implemented the OSA intervention and those that did not.
Conclusions:
- Successful implementation of acute sleep services hinges on the interplay between local context and the adoption of new clinical practices.
- Four key 'difference-makers' were identified, providing actionable insights for optimizing implementation strategies for OSA management in stroke patients.
- Findings offer guidance for tailoring and timing interventions to improve the adoption of OSA screening and treatment in cerebrovascular patient populations.
Related Concept Videos
Sleep Apnea
The condition is more prevalent among...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Management of Insomnia
Substance Use Disorders Affecting Sleep
Understanding the concepts of physical dependence,...

