Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
Published on: November 7, 2025
Watch and Wait in practice: Adherence to surveillance after nonoperative management for rectal cancer
Lena K Egbert1, Vaishnavi Kavirayani2, Kellie L Mathis3
1Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
Background:
Surveillance after neoadjuvant therapy and complete clinical response, known as "Watch and Wait," is an accepted treatment approach for locally advanced rectal cancer. Watch and Wait replaces surgical resection with rigorous surveillance for early identification of regrowth. However, there are scant data on adherence to surveillance. This study aimed to assess the adherence to Watch and Wait and the receipt of optimal surveillance.
Methods:
A multicenter cohort of patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma from 2021to 2022 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent Watch and Wait after neoadjuvant therapy and complete clinical response were included. The primary endpoint was receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-based surveillance. Patients were stratified by receipt of optimal surveillance, defined as completion of all required imaging and endoscopic surveillance elements during their analyzed time within Watch and Wait. Variables were compared with Fisher exact or Mann-Whitney U tests. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for time-to-event analysis.
Results:
Fifty-three patients underwent Watch and Wait. Of these, 33 (62%) had optimal surveillance, with a median follow-up of 17 months. Those receiving optimal surveillance were younger (median age 54 vs 63 years, P = .04), and there were no differences by socioeconomic factors. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the most common missed events leading to suboptimal surveillance were an endoscopic or imaging examination before 9 months and a full colonoscopy before 18 months.
Conclusion:
Of patients who underwent Watch and Wait, 62% received optimal surveillance. Patients were at greatest risk for missing the first required endoscopic or imaging surveillance and the first full colonoscopy. Patients undergoing nonoperative management are most likely to miss surveillance in the critical first year, during which regrowth occurs.
More Related Videos
05:22Intraoperative Strategy under Complex Vascular Adhesion for Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Bismuth-Corlette Type IIIb Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
Published on: February 13, 2026
12:45Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy