Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
Three-Dimensional Change of Molar Position During Alignment and Leveling With PASS and MBT: A Randomized Controlled
Hong Su1,2, Kaiyuan Xu3,4, Zimeng Zhuang2,5
1First Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, 100034, China, bjmu.edu.cn.
Backgrounds:
With the development of straight wire appliance (SWA), especially the rountine use of nickel-titanium (NiTi) archwires in the initial stage has largely eliminated the need for bending up. However, engaging fine NiTi wire into the molar buccal tube with built-in forward tipping prescription can induce unintended mesial tipping and mesialization of maxillary molars, leading to early anchorage loss. This single-center, two-arm parallel randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the physiologic anchorage spee-wire system (PASS) with the Mclaughlin-Bennet-Trevici straight-wire system (MBT) in terms of their ability to preserve maxillary anchorage control during the alignment and leveling.
Methods:
Sixty-four patients with Angle Class I or II malocclusion undergoing maxillary first premolar extraction were recruited. Minimal randomization was used to select the sample. Two bracket systems were used-PASS and MBT. Digital dental models were acquired at pre-treatment(T0), the first 3 months during treatment(T1), and the first 6 months during treatment(T2). Study models of different time point were superimposed to evaluate movements of maxillary first molars, canines, and central incisors.
Results:
During the first 6 months of the treatment, maxillary first molars in the PASS group exhibited distal tipping (2.67° ± 4.59°) and distal movement (0.03 ± 1.02 mm). In contrast, the MBT group showed mesial tipping (1.95° ± 3.04°) and mesial movement (0.67 ± 0.79 mm). Additionally, the maxillary canines also exhibited treatment difference. The increase of inter-canine width was significantly smaller increased in the PASS group (1.31 ± 2.00 mm) compared to the MBT group (2.37 ± 1.72 mm). No other difference was found.
Conclusion:
Compared with the MBT system, PASS was better at preserving maxillary anchorage during the alignment and leveling stage. These findings suggest that PASS offers superior physiological anchorage control in the early stages of treatment without the need for auxiliary appliances.
Related Concept Videos
Beams with Unsymmetric Loadings
The first moment-area theorem determines the slope at any point on the beam. This theorem indicates that the change in slope between two points on a beam...
Differential Leveling
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
Design Example: Maintaining Level of an Embankment
Adjusting a Traverse
Introduction and Methods of Leveling

