Case for caution in expanding attention deficit hyperactivity disorder prescribing
Max Hankin1, Anthony Hew1,2,3,4, Shalini Arunogiri5,6
1Drug Health Services, Western Health, Footscray, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract:
Expanding psychostimulant prescribing to general practitioners (GPs) addresses Australia's attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) access crisis, but risks significant unintended consequences. This article highlights the cumulative risks of long-term stimulant use and the danger of fragmented care models. We argue that inconsistent training and the rise of vertically integrated telehealth platforms threaten to reduce ADHD care to a volume-based pharmacological service. To protect public health, Australia requires a national framework prioritising mandatory education, shared care pathways and periodic reviews. Success must be measured by the quality of holistic care, not merely script volume.
More Related Videos
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
13:09Using Brain Activation nir-HEG/Q-EEG and Execution Measures CPTs in a ADHD Assessment Protocol
Published on: April 1, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists
CNS Stimulants: Cocaine, Amphetamines and Cannabinoids
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
