Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 22, 2026

An Immunohistopathologic Study to Profile the Folate Receptor Beta Macrophage and Vascular Immune Microenvironment in Giant Cell Arteritis
Published on: February 8, 2019
Structured Vascular Segment Analysis for Giant Cell Arteritis: A Proposed Scoring System for CTA-Based Diagnosis
Girish Bathla1, Pranjal Rai2, Paul J Farnsworth1
1From the Department of Radiology (G.B., P.R., P.J.F., N.G.C., V.M.S.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Background And Purpose:
Imaging for giant cell arteritis (GCA) has traditionally relied on ultrasound, MRI, and, more recently, nuclear medicine. CTA has not been systematically evaluated, despite near-universal availability, rapid acquisition, and comprehensive neck vessel assessment. We evaluated the ability of CTA to discriminate between patients with biopsy-proved GCA and age- and sex-matched controls by assessing cervical arterial abnormalities across multiple cervical arterial segments.
Materials And Methods:
This retrospective single-center study included 20 biopsy-proved GCA cases (with CTA performed within 4 weeks before or 2 weeks after biopsy) and 20 age- and sex-matched controls. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed 21 predefined arterial segments for abnormalities (absent/present). Segment-level positivity was defined by circumferential wall thickening, >50% stenosis/occlusion, or perivascular inflammatory fat stranding. Vessel-group-level involvement was through consensus positivity (both readers positive; either side). Per-patient total scores were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic analysis (DeLong area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]), prespecified thresholds with secondary exploratory analysis through McNemar testing, and interreader agreement by percent agreement and Cohen κ.
Results:
Median age was 76 years (interquartile range, 70-84 years); 60% were women in both groups. Across 806 evaluable segments, consensus involvement in GCA cases was most frequent along the maxillary (80%; 16/20), facial (75%; 15/20), and superficial temporal (70%; 14/20) arteries. Total-score discrimination was excellent (AUROC 0.971 for both readers). At total score ≥3, sensitivity/specificity were 0.90/1.00 for both readers, with paired differences favoring cases (exact McNemar P < .001). Pooled segment-level agreement was high (agreement 0.978; κ 0.924).
Conclusions:
Structured multisegment CTA scoring of craniocervical arterial segments showed excellent discrimination of biopsy-proved GCA from matched controls, supporting CTA as a useful diagnostic tool in patients with GCA.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation

