Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model
Published on: April 18, 2015
Streamlined calculation of kidney function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with population-based arterial input
Xin Mu1,2, Mira M Liu1,2, Haitham Al-Mubarak1,2
1BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Objectives:
Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can assess kidney function, but artifacts and complex post-processing limit its use. We calculated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) by combining a population-based arterial input function (pAIF) with a whole-kidney pharmacokinetic model (WKPM). We also compared DCE-MRI eGFR and RPF with serum eGFR and arterial spin labeling (ASL) derived RPF, respectively.
Materials And Methods:
In a prospective single-center study, 43 patients (30 M/13 F, 59.0 ± 11.8 y) with renal masses underwent multiparametric 1.5-T MRI, before and 3 months after nephrectomy (n = 15), including coronal, fat-saturated volumetric DCE-MRI (5-s temporal resolution) and background-suppressed pseudocontinuous ASL. DCE-MRI eGFR and RPF were measured by WKPM, incorporating individual-based arterial input function (iAIF) and population-based arterial input function (pAIF) as inputs. Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, and Mann-Whitney U statistics were used.
Results:
Serum eGFR (mean 67.55 mL/min/1.73 m²) and DCE-MRI (mean eGFR pAIF 59.49, iAIF 63.60 mL/min/1.73 m²) were measured in 51 MRIs: correlation with serum eGFR was stronger for pAIF (r = 0.61, p < 0.001) than iAIF (r = 0.33, p = 0.018), with comparable Bland-Altman bias (-11.9% and -9.1%, respectively). RPF was measured by both DCE-MRI and ASL in 21 MRIs: mean RPF was 229.3 (ASL), 229.7 (pAIF), and 390.4 (iAIF) mL/min (p = 0.018). Correlation of pAIF RPF with ASL-derived RPF (r = 0.65, p < 0.001) was stronger than for iAIF RPF (r = 0.53, p = 0.014), with lower Bland-Altman bias (pAIF -1.0% versus iAIF 39.5%).
Conclusion:
DCE-MRI using pAIF and WKPM provides simplified, robust single-kidney function estimates.
Relevance Statement:
This study proposes a simplified DCE-MRI post-processing method using a population-based arterial input function combined with a whole-kidney pharmacokinetic model. It avoids complex corticomedullary segmentation and minimizes aortic region-of-interest variability, and enables clinically feasible estimation of single-kidney function, supporting broader adoption of renal DCE-MRI in clinical practice.
Key Points:
Population-based arterial input function reduces inter-observer variability and sensitivity to aortic region-of-interest placement artifacts. Whole-kidney modeling avoids complex segmentation of the cortex and medulla regions. DCE-MRI using population-AIF and whole-kidney modeling yields eGFR and RPF significantly correlated with serum and ASL references. Streamlined post-processing workflow supports broader routine clinical use of DCE-MRI.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Measurement of Glomerular Filtration Rate
Determination of Renal Drug Clearance: Graphical and Midpoint Methods
The graphical method involves plotting the rate of drug excretion in urine against the plasma drug concentration. By analyzing the graph, the clearance can be calculated and obtained. Drugs rapidly excreted by the kidneys exhibit a...
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Measurement of Serum Creatinine Concentration and Clearance

